Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?

Path	csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:20:02 -0500
Return-Path	<cppmods@glengoyne.dreamhost.com>
Sender	std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com
Approved	james.dennett@gmail.com
Message-ID	<d3ituoF60v2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
Newsgroups	comp.std.c++
From	Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>
Subject	Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?
Organization	unknown
References	<820594f6-b670-4dba-8254-26d352489616@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
X-Original-Date	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:44:02 +0100
X-Submission-Address	std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com
Date	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:10:12 CST
Lines	24
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace	sv3-KJEEUR18AwiAkcsGmJAu5jcuny2zixatn4GM5943WLe26TpYkUXgu1xUSpdOxcIaHDTZ5xO4kOPTb8r!Go7vKGmJonYsclR7b32cF3wPXfQOfYqvR05Es5DgFt5KxZpEN9EEKXP81v4=
X-Complaints-To	abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications	http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2071
Xref	csiph.com comp.std.c++:773

Show key headers only | View raw

On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes Gerd Becker wrote:

Currently, you cannot rely on ADL within a class defining a member
> function of the same name as the function you would like to be called.
>

I must admit that my C++ is getting a bit rusty, but this "problem" was
well-known a decade ago, typically manifesting with std::swap and member
functions of the name.  The solution then was equally well known, and
continues to work in C++11/14:

  using std::begin;
  auto i = begin(c);

Richard

-- 
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name  lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-27 11:22 -0600
  Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name   lookup explicitly? Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-30 11:54 -0600
    Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name    lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-01 21:09 -0600
      Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600
        Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name  lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:29 -0600
          Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:35 -0600
  Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name  lookup explicitly? Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> - 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600
    Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name   lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:14 -0600

csiph-web