Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:00:02 -0500 |
| Return-Path | <cppmods@glengoyne.dreamhost.com> |
| Sender | std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com |
| Approved | austern@google.com |
| Message-ID | <5e134e90-067e-4d71-bf40-c4396bfc52f4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> |
| Subject | Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? |
| Organization | unknown |
| References | <820594f6-b670-4dba-8254-26d352489616@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:27:31 -0700 (PDT) |
| X-Submission-Address | std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com |
| Date | Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:54:20 CST |
| Lines | 20 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-4jMbNBPU3V4qGRvrtjsCD5fmewi6jr70WXrDvcqF7POXJFXaPXKV/rImGxlsfw082a7RBdixERz5XQX!crl1iDsjA6cshDFz51a7lkhuwScm/Xc2GQpTMWaUAv/0gFLGJPx7s535VQPjyx5V5KjofRzxsAGH!Z+YUu3e38Uo= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@giganews.com |
| X-DMCA-Notifications | http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1856 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.std.c++:765 |
Show key headers only | View raw
You can just declare a free function outside of class like
inline Iterator begin_force_adl(Iterator& it)
{
auto p = begin(it);
}
And call it explicitly qualifying from your member function.
Not sure if it's what you were asking for.
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-27 11:22 -0600
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Anton Bikineev <ant.bikineev@googlemail.com> - 2015-07-30 11:54 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-12 13:00 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:29 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:35 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> - 2015-08-20 01:10 -0600
Re: Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly? Johannes Gerd Becker <johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:14 -0600
csiph-web