Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| Subject | Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums |
| Date | 2011-08-24 17:40 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <4e557e0c$1@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4e49ea26$2@news.x-privat.org> <j2fuat$u6f$1@usenet.stanford.edu> |
On 8/24/2011 5:06 PM, Seungbeom Kim wrote:
>
> It looks similar to a simple-declaration, but its syntax must be
> something entirely different. You can neither put a semicolon at
> the end of the list of the enumerators, nor use different types
> for different enumerators.
> I think this is a case where a syntax that is too similar but not the
> same can be more confusing than a syntax that looks different enough.
> We might face questions like '"int i1, i2;" is equivalent to "int i1;
> int i2;" but why isn't it the case inside an enum?'
>
> Anyway, this is a matter of taste, after all.
Actually perhaps the following is acceptable after all:
enum class WindowOptions : unsigned short : 2 { A, B, C }; // ?
enum class AdvancedWindowOptions : WindowOptions { D, E };
I think it makes more sense than what I previously suggested.
-Phil
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard <philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-16 21:28 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-18 07:54 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-24 17:39 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Bart van Ingen Schenau<bart@ingen.ddns.info> - 2011-08-25 20:51 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums =3D?ISO-8859-15?Q?Daniel_Kr=3DFCgler?=3D <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.= com> - 2011-09-07 11:08 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-08 14:46 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum... why not use "using"? "peter miller"<fuchsia.groan@virgin.net> - 2011-09-12 11:18 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum... why not use "using"? Miles Bader<miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-13 09:29 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum... why not use "using"? "peter miller"<fuchsia.groan@virgin.net> - 2011-09-15 14:13 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-08-18 07:51 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Victor Bazarov<v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Paavo Helde<myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Francis Glassborow<francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2011-08-24 14:52 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 17:39 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-18 07:53 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 14:52 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-18 07:52 -0600
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-23 18:20 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard <philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 14:52 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard <philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 14:52 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Francis Glassborow<francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums "Bo Persson"<bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums red floyd<no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Seungbeom Kim<musiphil@bawi.org> - 2011-08-24 14:06 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 17:39 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 17:40 -0700
Re: New strongly type enum proposal featuring inherited enums Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> - 2011-08-24 17:40 -0700
csiph-web