Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.security > #202
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.security |
| Subject | Re: Security breach? |
| Date | Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:26:45 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <slrnkf1be4.mae.BitTwister@wb.home.test> (permalink) |
| References | <XnsA145508078CBMyBigKitty@216.196.97.131> <slrnkevaie.4qm.BitTwister@wb.home.test> <i1OHs.32904$3S5.11697@newsfe18.iad> <XnsA1452A741B196MyBigKitty@216.196.97.131> <slrnkevu1b.sfk.BitTwister@wb.home.test> <XnsA145ABD95DD64MyBigKitty@216.196.97.131> <kcq2bm$m9a$1@dont-email.me> <87mwwfnz9i.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <XnsA145B4F687E30MyBigKitty@216.196.97.131> |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:26:45 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="01ebc46a7b3235bdf3c7e7c89587bdfa"; logging-data="32096"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Dg4Z820zFFnK5f+YXVmM0qisQT0/F31c=" |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:wpH2B3gD0XFageQBYn7zyy01rXc= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.security:202 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:47:37 -0600, Ohmster wrote: > I know > what my OS is, but I do not use the name often and got distracted. I am not sure if your Linux OS is supported, security patch wise. You may need to consider some other OS. Here is a brief list of types of patches I am talking about. https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_Advisories Lots of malware is generated within 12 to 36 hours after a patch has been released.
Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-10 23:29 -0600
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-11 05:59 +0000
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-11 06:10 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 02:45 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-11 20:44 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 15:06 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-11 22:26 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 16:45 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 00:24 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 19:34 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 02:16 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 21:04 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 05:44 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-12 16:29 -0600
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-13 03:01 +0000
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-13 07:24 -0500
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-13 14:51 +0000
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-13 10:45 -0500
Re: Security breach? Jim Beard <jdbeard@patriot.net> - 2013-01-13 12:21 -0500
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-13 12:59 -0500
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-13 20:40 +0000
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-13 16:14 -0500
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-13 23:51 +0000
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-14 17:39 +0000
Re: Security breach? GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2013-01-14 16:16 -0500
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-14 21:48 +0000
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-13 20:35 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 17:05 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 00:26 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 03:10 -0600
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-11 11:31 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 15:53 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-11 23:05 +0100
Re: Security breach? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-01-11 22:14 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 16:47 -0600
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-12 00:26 +0000
Re: Security breach? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-01-12 09:23 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-12 16:31 -0600
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-12 16:36 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-13 14:45 +0100
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 16:39 -0600
Re: Security breach? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2013-01-12 00:08 +0000
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-11 20:50 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 15:19 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-11 22:30 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 16:49 -0600
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 02:36 -0600
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 02:52 -0600
Re: Security breach? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2013-01-11 03:10 -0500
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 02:39 -0600
Re: Security breach? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-01-11 10:53 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 15:12 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-11 22:53 +0100
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 15:57 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-11 23:29 +0100
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 16:55 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-11 23:59 +0100
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 17:07 -0600
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-12 00:24 +0100
Re: Security breach? `blindshell' ...INFECTED (PORTS: 465) Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 17:48 -0600
Re: Security breach? `blindshell' ...INFECTED (PORTS: 465) Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 18:07 -0600
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 00:16 +0000
Re: Security breach? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-01-12 12:13 +0100
Re: Security breach? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-12 18:30 +0000
Re: Security breach? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-01-11 22:07 +0000
Re: Security breach? Ohmster <root@dev.nul> - 2013-01-11 17:22 -0600
csiph-web