Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75764 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300 |
| Last post | 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 454 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 14:39 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-07 22:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:35 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 10:53 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-08 21:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:21 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:15 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:46 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:09 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 18:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 17:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-11 19:01 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:32 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:29 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-12 11:07 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 09:06 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-18 16:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-18 21:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-19 01:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:39 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:31 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 19:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-19 12:17 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 02:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:28 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:19 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-25 12:49 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 16:45 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:51 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 08:42 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 09:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 19:48 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 00:44 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 00:57 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:14 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:05 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 02:00 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 14:52 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:29 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 10:09 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:23 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:47 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 07:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:05 +0000
Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 13:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 20:21 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-29 01:41 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-29 11:07 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-29 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-29 22:15 +0000
Re: Accents. Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-10-30 17:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-30 17:31 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 19:31 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:14 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:11 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:35 +0100
Re: Accents. candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-30 21:40 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 15:18 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:17 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:46 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:25 +0000
LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 20:50 -0400
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:14 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:41 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:57 +0000
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 00:12 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 00:19 -0500
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 14:20 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:02 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:42 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:31 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:16 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:51 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:48 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:42 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:21 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:59 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:41 +0100
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 08:56 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:53 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-31 19:02 -0700
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:32 +0000
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:19 +0000
TV tropes (was: Re: Accents.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-20 11:01 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 13:10 +0100
Re: TV tropes Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-20 17:57 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 21:28 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:10 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:14 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:09 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 07:41 +0000
Re: TV tropes Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-21 09:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:13 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:17 +0100
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 19:28 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:43 +0100
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 23:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 04:06 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:24 +0100
Re: Not Blade Runner Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:57 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:22 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:22 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:50 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:20 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:34 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:47 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:05 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Blade runner c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 15:40 -0500
Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 22:30 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 17:48 -0500
Re: Flashlights Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-11-03 20:26 -0800
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-05 03:44 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 01:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:20 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 20:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:26 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 11:56 +0100
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:30 -0500
Re: Flashlights candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-11-07 16:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-07 18:11 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 22:42 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-07 21:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-08 13:31 +0100
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-08 16:05 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-08 20:06 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-09 00:04 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-09 20:08 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-10 12:07 +0000
Re: Flashlights John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> - 2025-11-09 19:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 05:09 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 01:31 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:39 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 07:51 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:39 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 22:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:52 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:32 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 06:49 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-22 03:14 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 11:32 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 22:00 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 09:40 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 20:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 01:42 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 02:17 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 21:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-24 15:04 -0800
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-24 22:48 -0500
Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 07:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 03:43 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 09:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:14 -0800
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:54 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 18:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:32 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:39 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 22:26 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 07:34 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 02:40 -0500
City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-26 11:18 +0100
Re: City fauna rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:40 +0000
Re: City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 12:39 +0100
Re: City fauna The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:56 +0000
Re: City fauna "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 13:16 +0100
Re: City fauna rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:39 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 18:55 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:40 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:03 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:36 -0500
Re: Chemical photography candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-01 21:50 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:31 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 22:00 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 05:08 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-26 21:02 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-26 13:29 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 01:57 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 23:13 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:47 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:09 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:45 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:37 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 23:47 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 06:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 01:38 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 02:58 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 09:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 05:20 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 11:28 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:32 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:19 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 11:45 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 11:41 +0000
Punt guns. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:03 +0100
Re: Punt guns. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 13:19 +0000
Re: Punt guns. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:43 +0100
Re: Punt guns. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:42 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 22:10 -0500
Punt guns "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:06 +0100
Re: Punt guns Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-29 08:58 -0800
Re: Punt guns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:34 -0500
Re: Punt guns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-30 01:05 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 19:19 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:25 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 08:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-28 20:14 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 19:20 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-28 21:04 +0100
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 01:55 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:39 -0500
Bears "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:07 +0100
Re: Bears c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-30 00:51 -0500
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 20:09 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 23:12 -0500
Repopulating bears, wolves... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-29 14:10 +0100
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-29 08:53 -0800
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:59 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:49 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:19 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-30 03:57 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-30 10:33 +0000
Re: Repopulating bears, wolves... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:40 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-29 18:32 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-29 22:46 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-26 22:40 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 11:48 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-27 19:07 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-27 19:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-27 20:23 +0100
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:13 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:17 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:21 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:29 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:13 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 09:19 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 23:16 -0500
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-27 22:10 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 05:17 +0000
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-28 00:26 -0500
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:10 +0000
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-28 06:15 +0000
Re: Chemical photography The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-28 07:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:27 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 19:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:22 -0500
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 20:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:23 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:23 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:05 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:21 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:54 -0500
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:17 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-05 11:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:41 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:16 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 22:22 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:10 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:24 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 02:44 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 21:53 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:12 +0100
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 23:14 +0100
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:01 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:19 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:33 +0000
Blade runner. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:29 +0100
Re: Blade runner. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:56 +0000
Re: Blade runner. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 21:38 -0400
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:31 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:48 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:22 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 23:36 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:51 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:48 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 15:03 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:15 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:39 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:26 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:44 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:05 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:54 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:49 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:13 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 18:48 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:12 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:11 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 12:26 +0000
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-03 09:17 -0800
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:42 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:01 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:33 +0000
Re: Accents. Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:43 -0700
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-02 19:30 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:21 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-30 22:48 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:58 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:25 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:09 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:29 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:50 -0700
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:28 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:27 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:41 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:36 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:11 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:54 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-28 09:34 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-26 13:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-10-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-27 08:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:37 +0100
OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-02 18:49 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 06:54 +0000
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-03 08:19 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 09:34 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-27 21:26 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 03:36 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 01:33 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:52 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-12 02:43 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:12 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:02 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 06:39 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-12 02:59 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-13 16:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 18:38 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:45 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:17 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 03:28 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-13 03:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:55 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 21:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 00:35 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:21 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 06:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-14 17:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 20:01 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-15 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:24 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 06:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 09:00 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:27 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-16 07:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-17 22:24 -0400
Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:08 +0200
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:15 -0400
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:46 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-16 04:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 10:29 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 01:49 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 15:43 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-14 21:30 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-14 22:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100
Page 13 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 23 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-27 11:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <10g9dk4$1bagg$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #77938 |
On 26/11/2025 21:29, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 11/26/25 13:02, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:37:31 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 25/11/2025 18:58, rbowman wrote: >>>> I don't begrudge the raccoon the water but I wish he would stop washing >>>> his filthy paws in the water. >>> >>> Raccoons are becoming domestic pets >> >> I definitely don't need a trash panda as a pet. The semi-feral cats are >> bad enough. The old, arthritic Persian does have house privileges but she >> is more like a taxidermy exhibit that moves around sometimes. > > I think they have been used semi-domesticated as pets by people who > are rich enough to pay for the damage their "pet" may inflict. Raccoons > are > possibly capable of domestication thru the same method as foxes have > been turned into expensive pets. That is to say by selective breeding over > a relatively few generations for the proper behavioral traits. These will > be like dogs which is the domesticated version of wolves. Thus the wild > versions of foxes or raccons will not be the same "race" as the > domesticated. > Likely they will be capable of interbreeding with the wild but they will > have different markings and so forth. > > Domesticated animals can have colors and so forth that might not > contribute to the survival of animals but which fanciers of the exotic > pets will select for in breeding as we see in dogs or cats. > > bliss I think that is more or less the true state of affairs Several species are getting accustomed to and relying on humanity - raccoons, squirrels, various species of birds...even some bears...they all realise that humans are well fed and don't want to eat them any more. -- Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-27 19:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <mornjpF5it2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #77950 |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:45:08 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Several species are getting accustomed to and relying on humanity - > raccoons, squirrels, various species of birds...even some bears...they > all realise that humans are well fed and don't want to eat them any > more. Some areas in the city have bear-proof trash containers and advise people to avoid leaving pet food out and to get the fruit off the trees. The bears have figured out life is easier when humans are around. https://flashbak.com/feeding-the-bears-at-yellowstone-photos-from- the-1950s-and-1960s-448098/ When we went through Yellowstone in '52 part of the attraction was the bears lining up along the road to cadge handouts. Returning to the cabin after a fireside ranger talk we saw a bear sorting through the dumpster. I didn't see any bears the last time I passed though, 2019?. There still are campsites where you need a hard shell camper and not a tent though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-27 23:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <3b6dnY7NbK7UtLT0nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77971 |
On 11/27/25 14:37, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:45:08 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Several species are getting accustomed to and relying on humanity - >> raccoons, squirrels, various species of birds...even some bears...they >> all realise that humans are well fed and don't want to eat them any >> more. > > Some areas in the city have bear-proof trash containers and advise people > to avoid leaving pet food out and to get the fruit off the trees. The > bears have figured out life is easier when humans are around. > > https://flashbak.com/feeding-the-bears-at-yellowstone-photos-from- > the-1950s-and-1960s-448098/ > > When we went through Yellowstone in '52 part of the attraction was the > bears lining up along the road to cadge handouts. Returning to the cabin > after a fireside ranger talk we saw a bear sorting through the dumpster. > > I didn't see any bears the last time I passed though, 2019?. There still > are campsites where you need a hard shell camper and not a tent though. Bear attacks are UP the past few years. Bear attacks due to Stupid Humans are up as well. Ooooh ! Cute baby bear ! Momma bear won't mind if we run up to cuddle it ! ... They try to cuddle buffalo too. Too much Disney ..... Japan, bear attacks are up SO much that now they're sending ARMY units in to deal with them. The beasties are walking straight into buildings and proceeding to try and eat people. The mil can't seem to figure out that a 5.56 isn't the best bear weapon alas ... a 12ga with buckshot and/or slugs works much better. No, you don't need a .500 Nitro Express, no armored bears here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 06:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <most9pFbf5tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #77986 |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 23:47:03 -0500, c186282 wrote: > Japan, bear attacks are up SO much that now they're sending ARMY > units in to deal with them. The beasties are walking straight into > buildings and proceeding to try and eat people. The mil can't seem to > figure out that a 5.56 isn't the best bear weapon alas ... a 12ga > with buckshot and/or slugs works much better. No, you don't need a > .500 Nitro Express, no armored bears here. The biologists that mess around in grizzly territory favor 12 gauge pumps, alternate slugs and 00 buckshot. I go with a .357 but that isn't optimal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 01:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <HmCdnVkBx8zo3rT0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #77996 |
On 11/28/25 01:20, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 23:47:03 -0500, c186282 wrote: > >> Japan, bear attacks are up SO much that now they're sending ARMY >> units in to deal with them. The beasties are walking straight into >> buildings and proceeding to try and eat people. The mil can't seem to >> figure out that a 5.56 isn't the best bear weapon alas ... a 12ga >> with buckshot and/or slugs works much better. No, you don't need a >> .500 Nitro Express, no armored bears here. > > The biologists that mess around in grizzly territory favor 12 gauge pumps, > alternate slugs and 00 buckshot. I go with a .357 but that isn't optimal. Too small for maybe all but southeastern bears. 44 mag minimum, pref in a carbine. I think you can still get 265gr 44 bullets. SOMEbody makes a .50 S&W pistol/lever combo set ... saw an ad. Saw an old live cop show, Alaska, huge brown bear TOO close up - the cop took it down with a 12ga. Largest polar bears ... might want a tad more. The .375 H&H is good for most any thin-skinned critters. KICKS like a too-light 12ga alas :-) Lower-48 ... some park/conservation employees have determined that the .338 Mag rifle is as effective on the big stuff as the .375, but with less recoil.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 07:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <10gbift$25949$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #77996 |
On 28/11/2025 06:20, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 23:47:03 -0500, c186282 wrote: > >> Japan, bear attacks are up SO much that now they're sending ARMY >> units in to deal with them. The beasties are walking straight into >> buildings and proceeding to try and eat people. The mil can't seem to >> figure out that a 5.56 isn't the best bear weapon alas ... a 12ga >> with buckshot and/or slugs works much better. No, you don't need a >> .500 Nitro Express, no armored bears here. > > The biologists that mess around in grizzly territory favor 12 gauge pumps, > alternate slugs and 00 buckshot. I go with a .357 but that isn't optimal. What's wrong with a 50 cal machine gun or a Bushmaster 25mm autocannon?. Apart from picking up the pieces. -- “It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 02:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <tWudnX6nzZXfy7T0nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #78003 |
On 11/28/25 02:20, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/11/2025 06:20, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 23:47:03 -0500, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Japan, bear attacks are up SO much that now they're sending ARMY >>> units in to deal with them. The beasties are walking straight into >>> buildings and proceeding to try and eat people. The mil can't >>> seem to >>> figure out that a 5.56 isn't the best bear weapon alas ... a 12ga >>> with buckshot and/or slugs works much better. No, you don't need a >>> .500 Nitro Express, no armored bears here. >> >> The biologists that mess around in grizzly territory favor 12 gauge >> pumps, >> alternate slugs and 00 buckshot. I go with a .357 but that isn't optimal. > > What's wrong with a 50 cal machine gun or a Bushmaster 25mm autocannon?. > Apart from picking up the pieces. Well, if it's an angry bear then we don't care how many pieces ..... :-) Alas both of those options are just a bit heavy to carry through hill country unless you're 19, large, and take lots of steroids. All-around for Alaska, .338 WM. If bears are a concern, the top ctg should be a heavier bullet. Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the campfire.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 09:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <mot7c8Fd065U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #78004 |
On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 02:58:59 -0500, c186282 wrote: > Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a > heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, > usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the > campfire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M30_Luftwaffe_Drilling Beats the hell out of the M6. Savage still makes a .22/.410 combo. I don't know if .410 has become more available with the .410/.45LC revolvers. Like 16 gauge it got scarce. My mother had a 16 ga. which was considered a ladies shotgun in her day but now it's all 12 or 20.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 05:20 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <DSydnSAz49rK6rT0nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #78006 |
On 11/28/25 04:12, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 02:58:59 -0500, c186282 wrote: > >> Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a >> heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, >> usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the >> campfire. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M30_Luftwaffe_Drilling > > Beats the hell out of the M6. Savage still makes a .22/.410 combo. I don't > know if .410 has become more available with the .410/.45LC revolvers. Like > 16 gauge it got scarce. My mother had a 16 ga. which was considered a > ladies shotgun in her day but now it's all 12 or 20. .410 is a bit, well, small ... never was sure what you'd use 'em for. 20ga was more the "ladies gun". 16ga really wasn't bad, nearly a 12 but a bit less kick. These days alas, you'd be pressed to find 16ga on any shelf, it just kind of faded away. You CAN still buy 10ga ... but again you'd have to special-order the shells.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 11:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <10gc103$2b8ov$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78008 |
On 28/11/2025 10:20, c186282 wrote: > On 11/28/25 04:12, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 02:58:59 -0500, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a >>> heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, >>> usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the >>> campfire. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M30_Luftwaffe_Drilling >> >> Beats the hell out of the M6. Savage still makes a .22/.410 combo. I >> don't >> know if .410 has become more available with the .410/.45LC revolvers. >> Like >> 16 gauge it got scarce. My mother had a 16 ga. which was considered a >> ladies shotgun in her day but now it's all 12 or 20. > > .410 is a bit, well, small ... never was sure > what you'd use 'em for. > I have heard them called 'rook guns' - suitable for vermin really. Rabbits, squirrels, rats, smaller bids - probably could take a pigeon down. > 20ga was more the "ladies gun". 16ga really > wasn't bad, nearly a 12 but a bit less kick. > > These days alas, you'd be pressed to find 16ga > on any shelf, it just kind of faded away. > I never saw one. 20s and 12s yes. 20 is a useable weapon for most birds > You CAN still buy 10ga ... but again you'd have > to special-order the shells. > not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going for deer you should be using a rifle I believe there are a few punt guns around still though :-) -- There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 20:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <mouf71Fj98hU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #78011 |
On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going > for deer you should be using a rifle In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. > I believe there are a few punt guns around still though Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder how far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's collection was broken up and sold off.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 23:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <Ux2cnV53W8bP6bf0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #78023 |
On 11/28/25 15:32, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >> for deer you should be using a rifle > > In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. > >> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though > > Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt > guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder > firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder how > far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's > collection was broken up and sold off. Oh gawd ! Don't try to SHOOT those old things !!! Boom ! As for "man-portable" ... I think some of the punt guns kind of stretched that def :-) Unsporting regardless. Biggest useful/sporting now is 10ga.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 11:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <10gemcg$39ian$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78042 |
On 29/11/2025 04:19, c186282 wrote: > On 11/28/25 15:32, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >>> for deer you should be using a rifle >> >> In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. >> >>> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though >> >> Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt >> guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder >> firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder how >> far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's >> collection was broken up and sold off. > > Oh gawd ! Don't try to SHOOT those old things !!! > > Boom ! > > As for "man-portable" ... I think some of the punt > guns kind of stretched that def :-) > > Unsporting regardless. > Wildfowling in the Fens wasn't a sport. It was a *living*. Like trawling, rather than angling. > Biggest useful/sporting now is 10ga. > -- I was brought up to believe that you should never give offence if you can avoid it; the new culture tells us you should always take offence if you can. There are now experts in the art of taking offence, indeed whole academic subjects, such as 'gender studies', devoted to it. Sir Roger Scruton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 11:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <10gem5v$39ian$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78023 |
On 28/11/2025 20:32, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >> for deer you should be using a rifle > > In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. > >> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though > > Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt > guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder > firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder how > far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's > collection was broken up and sold off. > The few accounts of Punt guns being fired I have read show a simply monumental recoil I bet there is a you tube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTRL1d7jO7c That's 1.68" bore https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cO2D4rjQ1o (The Fens are England's answer to Appalachia) -- "Women actually are capable of being far more than the feminists will let them."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 14:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Punt guns. |
| Message-ID | <9h7rvlx29r.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #78052 |
On 2025-11-29 12:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/11/2025 20:32, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >>> for deer you should be using a rifle >> >> In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. >> >>> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though >> >> Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt >> guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder >> firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder how >> far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's >> collection was broken up and sold off. >> > The few accounts of Punt guns being fired I have read show a simply > monumental recoil > > I bet there is a you tube video > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTRL1d7jO7c > That's 1.68" bore I miss the part where he loads the gun. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cO2D4rjQ1o Ah, this is better :-) > > (The Fens are England's answer to Appalachia) > The thing is, why not use a proper little cannon, with all the attachments for pointing it and handling recoil? Just to be legal and say it is a shotgun for a man. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 13:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Punt guns. |
| Message-ID | <10gersq$3cneb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78057 |
On 29/11/2025 13:03, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-29 12:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 28/11/2025 20:32, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:28:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >>>> for deer you should be using a rifle >>> >>> In some populated areas you're limited to 12 gauge slugs for deer. >>> >>>> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though >>> >>> Harold's Club in Reno had a firearms museum that had a couple of punt >>> guns. They were pushing the Montana requirement that smokeless powder >>> firearms must have a bore of 2" or less and be man portable. I wonder >>> how >>> far back the punt went when they were fired. Sadly, the Harold's >>> collection was broken up and sold off. >>> >> The few accounts of Punt guns being fired I have read show a simply >> monumental recoil >> >> I bet there is a you tube video >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTRL1d7jO7c >> That's 1.68" bore > > I miss the part where he loads the gun. > > >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cO2D4rjQ1o > > Ah, this is better :-) > >> >> (The Fens are England's answer to Appalachia) >> > > The thing is, why not use a proper little cannon, with all the > attachments for pointing it and handling recoil? Just to be legal and > say it is a shotgun for a man. > > Lord I dont know, I think the punt gun was JUST light enough so you could carry it and mount it on a punt. Cannon would have been heavier. -- "Women actually are capable of being far more than the feminists will let them."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 14:43 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Punt guns. |
| Message-ID | <0t9rvlxhl5.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #78061 |
On 2025-11-29 14:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/11/2025 13:03, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-11-29 12:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: ... >> The thing is, why not use a proper little cannon, with all the >> attachments for pointing it and handling recoil? Just to be legal and >> say it is a shotgun for a man. >> >> > Lord I dont know, I think the punt gun was JUST light enough so you > could carry it and mount it on a punt. > > Cannon would have been heavier. On one of the photos Google found for me, it was a proper cannon. https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/punt-gun-1910-1920/ #5 Now that I see it in big size, I notice it is not a photo but a drawing. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 14:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Punt guns. |
| Message-ID | <10gf0ns$3ejvu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78063 |
On 29/11/2025 13:43, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-11-29 14:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 29/11/2025 13:03, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2025-11-29 12:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > ... > >>> The thing is, why not use a proper little cannon, with all the >>> attachments for pointing it and handling recoil? Just to be legal and >>> say it is a shotgun for a man. >>> >>> >> Lord I dont know, I think the punt gun was JUST light enough so you >> could carry it and mount it on a punt. >> >> Cannon would have been heavier. > > On one of the photos Google found for me, it was a proper cannon. > > https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/punt-gun-1910-1920/ > > #5 That WAS a cannon. Not a punt-gun! > > Now that I see it in big size, I notice it is not a photo but a drawing. > > Yes! -- In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act. - George Orwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-28 22:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chemical photography |
| Message-ID | <aVSdnRhUWLyq-bf0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #78011 |
On 11/28/25 06:28, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/11/2025 10:20, c186282 wrote: >> On 11/28/25 04:12, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 02:58:59 -0500, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a >>>> heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, >>>> usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the >>>> campfire. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M30_Luftwaffe_Drilling >>> >>> Beats the hell out of the M6. Savage still makes a .22/.410 combo. I >>> don't >>> know if .410 has become more available with the .410/.45LC revolvers. >>> Like >>> 16 gauge it got scarce. My mother had a 16 ga. which was considered a >>> ladies shotgun in her day but now it's all 12 or 20. >> >> .410 is a bit, well, small ... never was sure >> what you'd use 'em for. >> > I have heard them called 'rook guns' - suitable for vermin really. > Rabbits, squirrels, rats, smaller bids - probably could take a pigeon down. If you're CLOSE ... they just don't hold much shot. I think the buckshot loads are like four or five pellets in a row. Anyway, 'vermin gun' may be the best description. You might be able to shoot 45LC in some, but without rifling it's basically an olde-tyme musket. >> 20ga was more the "ladies gun". 16ga really >> wasn't bad, nearly a 12 but a bit less kick. >> >> These days alas, you'd be pressed to find 16ga >> on any shelf, it just kind of faded away. >> > I never saw one. 20s and 12s yes. > 20 is a useable weapon for most birds Precise shots sometimes use 20ga just to prove their skill. >> You CAN still buy 10ga ... but again you'd have >> to special-order the shells. >> > not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going > for deer you should be using a rifle Well, the 'punt gun' was invented in the UK as best I remember ... about 4ga. 10ga does have a place, esp in N.America, for longer- range fowl hunting - boosts out a LOT of shot. Kicks like a motherfucker though. Think there are still three or four name makers of the 10ga. Hmm, maybe that's the solution to polar bears ... a load of '0' buck or a huge-ass slug. > I believe there are a few punt guns around still though :-) Are those 'guns' ? More into 'small cannon' territory :-) A bit 'unsporting' too ... From pix I've seen, they weren't even meant to be held, had a sort of tang near the center point meant to be hooked around the rim of a boat. You fired them from a prone position. Shotgun bores are all basically the old musket bores from longer back. I think 28ga was .50 cal, 12ga was nominally the Brown Bess .75 cal. Wow ... forgot there was 28ga until just now ... maybe a bit more useful than .410 Try : https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/shotguns/beretta-a400-upland-xtra-grain-walnut-28-gauge-3in-semi-automatic-shotgun-28in/p/1777544 https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/cz-628-field-select-28-gauge-2-34in-blued-pump-shotgun-28in/p/1477236 https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/mossberg-silver-reserve-satin-black-walnut-28-gauge-2-34in-over-under-shotgun-26in/p/1776160 Still alive, but not exactly sure WHY.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-29 14:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Punt guns |
| Message-ID | <un7rvlx29r.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #78038 |
On 2025-11-29 04:10, c186282 wrote: > On 11/28/25 06:28, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 28/11/2025 10:20, c186282 wrote: >>> On 11/28/25 04:12, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 02:58:59 -0500, c186282 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hmm ... they USED to make something called a "drilling" ... like a >>>>> heavy rifle or shotgun with a small-caliber rifle barrel on top, >>>>> usually .22 ... good for big stuff and for rabbits roasting on the >>>>> campfire. >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M30_Luftwaffe_Drilling >>>> >>>> Beats the hell out of the M6. Savage still makes a .22/.410 combo. I >>>> don't >>>> know if .410 has become more available with the .410/.45LC >>>> revolvers. Like >>>> 16 gauge it got scarce. My mother had a 16 ga. which was considered a >>>> ladies shotgun in her day but now it's all 12 or 20. >>> >>> .410 is a bit, well, small ... never was sure >>> what you'd use 'em for. >>> >> I have heard them called 'rook guns' - suitable for vermin really. >> Rabbits, squirrels, rats, smaller bids - probably could take a pigeon >> down. > > If you're CLOSE ... they just don't hold much shot. > I think the buckshot loads are like four or five > pellets in a row. Anyway, 'vermin gun' may be the > best description. You might be able to shoot 45LC > in some, but without rifling it's basically an > olde-tyme musket. > >>> 20ga was more the "ladies gun". 16ga really >>> wasn't bad, nearly a 12 but a bit less kick. >>> >>> These days alas, you'd be pressed to find 16ga >>> on any shelf, it just kind of faded away. >>> >> I never saw one. 20s and 12s yes. >> 20 is a useable weapon for most birds > > Precise shots sometimes use 20ga just to prove > their skill. > >>> You CAN still buy 10ga ... but again you'd have >>> to special-order the shells. >>> >> not much need for anything larger than 12 in the UK, If you are going >> for deer you should be using a rifle > > Well, the 'punt gun' was invented in the UK as best > I remember ... about 4ga. > > 10ga does have a place, esp in N.America, for longer- > range fowl hunting - boosts out a LOT of shot. Kicks > like a motherfucker though. Think there are still > three or four name makers of the 10ga. Hmm, maybe > that's the solution to polar bears ... a load of '0' > buck or a huge-ass slug. > >> I believe there are a few punt guns around still though :-) > > Are those 'guns' ? More into 'small cannon' territory :-) > > A bit 'unsporting' too ... > > From pix I've seen, they weren't even meant to be held, > had a sort of tang near the center point meant to be > hooked around the rim of a boat. You fired them from > a prone position. > > Shotgun bores are all basically the old musket bores > from longer back. I think 28ga was .50 cal, 12ga was > nominally the Brown Bess .75 cal. > > Wow ... forgot there was 28ga until just now ... maybe > a bit more useful than .410 > > Try : > https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/shotguns/ > beretta-a400-upland-xtra-grain-walnut-28-gauge-3in-semi-automatic- > shotgun-28in/p/1777544 > > https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/cz-628- > field-select-28-gauge-2-34in-blued-pump-shotgun-28in/p/1477236 > > https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/shotguns/mossberg- > silver-reserve-satin-black-walnut-28-gauge-2-34in-over-under- > shotgun-26in/p/1776160 Sorry, you have been blocked You are unable to access sportsmans.com Why have I been blocked? This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. What can I do to resolve this? You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. > > Still alive, but not exactly sure WHY. > -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web