Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #56596
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Centos stream of batpiss |
| Date | 2024-06-16 22:44 +0100 |
| Organization | terraraq NNTP server |
| Message-ID | <wwvo780imvm.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1cednanf4p_sOsf7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <v3iuet$3i9vd$4@dont-email.me> <ToC8O.2$h4Ia.1@fx01.iad> <91I8O.16$raU6.4@fx16.iad> <v4ljsa$3s54t$2@dont-email.me> |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: > On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 18:09:09 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> ... and found a dependency on libc.so.6 which draws a line in the >> sand between Ubuntu 20 and Ubuntu 22 (and their Debian equivalents). >> I've always prided myself on creating binaries that will run on any >> version of an OS, but this dream has been derailed. We've told our >> Ubuntu 20 customers that if they want TLS 1.3 they have no choice but >> to upgrade their OS to Ubuntu 22. Only then can we send them new >> binaries. By the same token, our older binaries, which only support >> TLS 1.1, will not run under Ubuntu 22 ... > > Interesting. Were you able to track down the incompatibility any further? > Because it’s always been my understanding that binaries linked against > older versions of libc.so.6 will continue to run against newer versions, > and a lot of work is done with symbol versioning in glibc to ensure this. They do; his issue is the other way around, i.e. trying to run newer code on older Glibc. -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Centos stream of batpiss "26xh.0717" <26xh.0718@e6t4y.net> - 2024-06-01 00:45 -0400
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-06-01 12:44 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-02 23:15 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-06-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-16 02:46 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss "26xh.0717" <26xh.0718@e6t4y.net> - 2024-06-11 22:31 -0400
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-02 23:15 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-06-07 07:44 -0400
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-06-07 18:09 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-16 02:49 +0000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-16 22:44 +0100
Re: Centos stream of batpiss not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-06-17 08:55 +1000
Re: Centos stream of batpiss Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-17 07:47 +0100
csiph-web