Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #56596

Re: Centos stream of batpiss

From Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Centos stream of batpiss
Date 2024-06-16 22:44 +0100
Organization terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID <wwvo780imvm.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <1cednanf4p_sOsf7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <v3iuet$3i9vd$4@dont-email.me> <ToC8O.2$h4Ia.1@fx01.iad> <91I8O.16$raU6.4@fx16.iad> <v4ljsa$3s54t$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 18:09:09 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> ... and found a dependency on libc.so.6 which draws a line in the
>> sand between Ubuntu 20 and Ubuntu 22 (and their Debian equivalents).
>> I've always prided myself on creating binaries that will run on any
>> version of an OS, but this dream has been derailed.  We've told our
>> Ubuntu 20 customers that if they want TLS 1.3 they have no choice but
>> to upgrade their OS to Ubuntu 22.  Only then can we send them new
>> binaries.  By the same token, our older binaries, which only support
>> TLS 1.1, will not run under Ubuntu 22 ...
>
> Interesting. Were you able to track down the incompatibility any further? 
> Because it’s always been my understanding that binaries linked against 
> older versions of libc.so.6 will continue to run against newer versions, 
> and a lot of work is done with symbol versioning in glibc to ensure this.

They do; his issue is the other way around, i.e. trying to run newer
code on older Glibc.

-- 
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Centos stream of batpiss "26xh.0717" <26xh.0718@e6t4y.net> - 2024-06-01 00:45 -0400
  Re: Centos stream of batpiss Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-06-01 12:44 +0000
    Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-02 23:15 +0000
      Re: Centos stream of batpiss Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-06-03 03:25 +0000
        Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-16 02:46 +0000
    Re: Centos stream of batpiss "26xh.0717" <26xh.0718@e6t4y.net> - 2024-06-11 22:31 -0400
  Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-02 23:15 +0000
    Re: Centos stream of batpiss Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-06-07 07:44 -0400
      Re: Centos stream of batpiss Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-06-07 18:09 +0000
        Re: Centos stream of batpiss Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-16 02:49 +0000
          Re: Centos stream of batpiss Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-16 22:44 +0100
            Re: Centos stream of batpiss not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-06-17 08:55 +1000
              Re: Centos stream of batpiss Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-17 07:47 +0100

csiph-web