Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61445
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT |
| Date | 2024-11-28 09:30 +0000 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <vi9d76$fjo6$9@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <cmg31lxl0d.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <lq9ho9F2tegU3@mid.individual.net> <l6gj1lx10f.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vi74ak$3vogk$17@dont-email.me> <lqp9glFin9jU3@mid.individual.net> |
On 27/11/2024 19:16, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:46:12 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> Imagine my surprise at encountering 'commercial design' where it was
>> sufficient if the thing worked between +10°C and +40°C and the customer
>> did the product testing, in terms of returned items.
>
> My youthful idealism took a hit with my engineering statistics course.
> Much time was devoted to how many widgets have to be tested to insure only
> X% are crap, X being determined by the cost of replacing defective widgets
> versus the cost of doing it right.
>
It's a very important part of engineering. I once tested 1000
phototransistors to get an idea of the spreads.
It was a perfect bell curve with one end truncated. Except for two.
Those were obvious rejects that had slipped through.
Another time I got a panicky call from my boss. PA amplifiers were
popping like flies at a very important and well paid gig.
It turned out that on switch-on, the output hit the rails, and a relay
had been fitted to stop the loudspeakers blowing up. Shit design. But
anyway that put more voltage across the output transistors than they
were rated for. 'But it always worked before' I tested all the
transistors in stock. The whole batch were only marginally in spec.
(We left the amps powered up for 3 days solid to avoid switching them
on: once connected to a load the voltage sagged enough to be safe)
--
"First, find out who are the people you can not criticise. They are your
oppressors."
- George Orwell
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-17 23:11 -0500
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-18 09:42 -0800
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2024-11-21 07:35 +0800
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-21 09:52 +0100
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-21 19:54 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-21 21:38 +0100
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 01:14 -0500
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 10:19 +0100
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-04 00:35 -0500
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:57 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-04 00:39 -0500
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-21 04:45 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-21 02:06 -0500
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-21 08:05 -0800
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-21 12:04 +0100
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-21 19:59 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-27 13:33 +0100
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-27 12:46 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-27 19:16 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 09:30 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-28 19:42 +0000
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-21 02:05 -0500
csiph-web