Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #34902
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? |
| Date | 2022-06-29 12:45 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <t9he0o$1du01$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <95WdnTrQW_F5jyb_nZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <t9f6rv$p8ir$3@solani.org> <FqGdnZCsRc5jBCb_nZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 29/06/2022 01:17, 25.BZ959 wrote: > On 6/28/22 11:31 AM, Joerg Lorenz wrote: >> Am 28.06.22 um 16:40 schrieb 25.BZ959: >>> https://www.dw.com/en/james-webb-space-telescope-just-a-huge-thermal-camera/a-62236601 >>> >>> >>> (incidental) >>> >>> Computer glitch solved >> >> Wrong group. > > Nope. Technology/computer issue of note and most of > our infrastructure runs on Linux/Unix these days. > Or do you just think you write it and forget it ? > YOU might forget it, but 'the world' may be STUCK > with it for years or decades and have no answer > for what happens when it breaks. > > Only a few years ago, a design/programmer I knew got > a job with a govt institution. They had one demand, > that he learn how to program/maintain their COBOL > software base which took care of the accounting and > scheduling and a few other vital things. They had > the budget in the 60s to develop all that - and now > did NOT have the budget to re-do it in some other > language. It WORKS, and if it STOPS working it's a > total disaster. > > So far as I know, you can still get emulators for IBM 360/370 > boxes (from IBM) so you can run that VERY old software. I > doubt anybody is literally running a 360 box, but there MAY > be a few 370 series boxes still out there. > > Old software/hardware sometimes DOESN'T just go away. True conservatism says if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Quite frankly 99% of all correspondence could be happily written in wordstar under CP/M Only the drive for planned obsolescence forces changes for profit, not for a better user experience or more efficiency. There is no worse input device than a touch screen. There is no cheaper device, either. -- The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. – H. L. Mencken, American journalist, 1880-1956
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 10:40 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-28 17:31 +0200
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:17 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-06-29 00:26 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 23:21 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-29 06:53 +0200
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:45 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-29 17:34 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 23:59 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:28 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2022-06-30 17:35 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2022-06-30 00:17 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:13 +0100
Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:34 -0400
Re: Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 22:02 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-28 17:57 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:46 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-29 05:30 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:53 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 00:02 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:14 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:00 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-29 23:17 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-30 04:15 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:27 -0400
csiph-web