Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #34923
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux |
| Subject | Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) |
| Followup-To | alt.folklore.computers |
| Date | 2022-06-30 18:34 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87fsjl4w86.fsf_-_@usenet.ankman.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <t9f6rv$p8ir$3@solani.org> <FqGdnZCsRc5jBCb_nZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <t9he0o$1du01$1@dont-email.me> <slrntbpqss.692.trepidation@vps.jonz.net> <t9kp3r$1vq8m$8@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.folklore.computers
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 19:13:15 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > On 30/06/2022 01:17, Allodoxaphobia wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:45:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>> Quite frankly 99% of all correspondence could be happily written in >>> wordstar under CP/M >> Heh... I still have WordStar 6.0 running under xdosemu on this >> machine. >> Just yesterday I printed off a dozen or so QSL cards that I crafted in >> PCL-5 Back In The Day. >> I've had WordStar on all my machines over the years -- starting with >> WordStar 2.0 on CP/M. WordStar 6.0 was the last decent version. >> After that the wheels started coming off. > > Joes Own Editor does perfect wordstar `emulation. Does it make use of the "Wordstar Diamond" too? Awesome then. I miss it. Sure, you can reassign keys from probably any other editor for that <https://texteditors.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WordStarDiamond>. Of course you lose default functions. Like the Diamond uses "d", which for example vi uses to delete stuff instead of moving the cursor. I suggest to continue in the folklore group. F'up2. -- Andreas
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 10:40 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-28 17:31 +0200
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:17 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-06-29 00:26 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 23:21 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-29 06:53 +0200
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:45 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-29 17:34 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 23:59 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:28 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2022-06-30 17:35 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2022-06-30 00:17 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:13 +0100
Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:34 -0400
Re: Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 22:02 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-28 17:57 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:46 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-29 05:30 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:53 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 00:02 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:14 +0100
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:00 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-29 23:17 -0400
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-30 04:15 +0000
Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:27 -0400
csiph-web