Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #34894

Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?

Subject Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux
References <95WdnTrQW_F5jyb_nZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <t9f6rv$p8ir$3@solani.org>
From "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net>
Date 2022-06-28 20:17 -0400
Message-ID <FqGdnZCsRc5jBCb_nZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/28/22 11:31 AM, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
> Am 28.06.22 um 16:40 schrieb 25.BZ959:
>> https://www.dw.com/en/james-webb-space-telescope-just-a-huge-thermal-camera/a-62236601
>>
>> (incidental)
>>
>> Computer glitch solved
> 
> Wrong group.

   Nope. Technology/computer issue of note and most of
   our infrastructure runs on Linux/Unix these days.
   Or do you just think you write it and forget it ?
   YOU might forget it, but 'the world' may be STUCK
   with it for years or decades and have no answer
   for what happens when it breaks.

   Only a few years ago, a design/programmer I knew got
   a job with a govt institution. They had one demand,
   that he learn how to program/maintain their COBOL
   software base which took care of the accounting and
   scheduling and a few other vital things. They had
   the budget in the 60s to develop all that - and now
   did NOT have the budget to re-do it in some other
   language. It WORKS, and if it STOPS working it's a
   total disaster.

   So far as I know, you can still get emulators for IBM 360/370
   boxes (from IBM) so you can run that VERY old software. I
   doubt anybody is literally running a 360 box, but there MAY
   be a few 370 series boxes still out there.

   Old software/hardware sometimes DOESN'T just go away.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 10:40 -0400
  Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-28 17:31 +0200
    Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:17 -0400
      Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-06-29 00:26 +0000
        Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 23:21 -0400
      Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-06-29 06:53 +0200
      Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:45 +0100
        Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-29 17:34 -0400
          Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 23:59 +0100
            Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:28 -0400
          Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2022-06-30 17:35 +0000
        Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2022-06-30 00:17 +0000
          Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:13 +0100
            Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-06-30 18:34 -0400
              Re: Resurrection of Wordstar documents (was: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ?) "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 22:02 -0400
  Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-28 17:57 +0000
    Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-28 20:46 -0400
      Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-29 05:30 +0000
        Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-29 12:53 +0100
          Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 00:02 -0400
            Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 19:14 +0100
              Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:00 -0400
        Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-29 23:17 -0400
          Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-06-30 04:15 +0000
            Re: NASA Had To Bring in the OLD Guys to Fix Hubble Telescope - Broader Message ? "25.BZ959" <25BZ959@nada.net> - 2022-06-30 21:27 -0400

csiph-web