Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #73724
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... |
| Date | 2025-09-08 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mi8l1dFm406U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <hCOdnYwIhZKdoCD1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <109jmsf$3i2d7$11@dont-email.me> <109ktf3$3tta6$5@dont-email.me> <mi6ct5FaikeU2@mid.individual.net> <109mdhc$7ige$13@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:09:32 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 07/09/2025 22:48, rbowman wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 21:29:07 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 11:30:39 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> There are far far more ARM chips in the world than Intel ones >>> >>> More ARM chips are made per year than the entire population of the >>> Earth. >>> >>> The same might be true of RISC-V, too. >> >> Do you count th RP2350 as a point for each? > > RP2350 is not RISC-V AFAIK > > Its ARM. It's both. It has two Cortex-M33 ARM cores and two Hazard3 RISC-V cores. Only two can be active at one time, but I've read it can be one ARM and one RISC-V. No idea how you would pull that off. I've got a couple of Pico 2 Ws but haven't done anything with RISC-V. There is a MicroPython uf2 for RISC-V, but that obscures the processor. I don't know if there are limitations between the two. https://micropython.org/download/RPI_PICO2/ I think the C SDK is a similar situation with the build being controlled by CMakeLists.txt, the same as Pico and Pico 2 builds are differentiated. I don't know why they did it other than to prove they could. People who have bench marked it concluded the RISC-V core is slower than the ARM although possibly a little faster than the Pico ARM Cortex-M0+.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ARM 32-bit Linux... Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-09-06 13:14 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-09-06 16:53 +0200
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-09-06 15:54 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-07 08:38 +1000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-07 04:06 -0400
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-07 11:30 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-07 07:21 -0400
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-07 21:29 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-07 21:48 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-08 12:09 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-08 18:24 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-08 19:14 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-08 18:19 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-08 19:28 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-07 18:25 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-06 22:53 +0200
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-06 22:43 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-09-06 23:54 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-07 01:50 +0000
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-07 04:24 -0400
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-07 04:20 -0400
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-07 11:28 +0100
Re: ARM 32-bit Linux... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-06 23:03 -0400
csiph-web