Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #966
| From | goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? |
| Date | 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ipdscf$nd6$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <ic7hafvdoc.fsf@verizon.net> <ic39l3vcz0.fsf@verizon.net> <ipbhl3$nd6$2@dont-email.me> <icbozqzflr.fsf@verizon.net> <ipdsbl$nd6$3@dont-email.me> |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:20:05 +0000, goarilla wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:10:24 -0400, despen wrote: > >> goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> >> writes: >> >>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:08:35 -0400, despen wrote: >>> >>>> despen@verizon.net writes: >>>> Follow up. >>>> >>>> Progress is calculated off file size. >>>> >>>> An approach that is sure to fail. >>> >>> out of curiousity how would you design an accurate progress meter ? >> >> To start with, see next sentence: >> >>>> They should never let the number hit 100%, perhaps a message, "still >>>> running, taking longer than expected..." >> >> Accurate would require that the program doing the conversion output >> percentage numbers as it runs. Only that program would know where it >> is in the input file. >> >> You can't really infer much from the size of the output file. > > yeah but a lot of times these programs are frontends for ffmpeg, > mencoder, vobcopy, lame, ... never mind i misread
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:43 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-04-26 16:23 -0500
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 17:43 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 23:43 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 21:48 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 08:22 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:41 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 17:58 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:10 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:18 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 16:59 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 12:53 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:08 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:17 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:05 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:20 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mark Hobley <markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co> - 2011-04-29 21:11 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mysterious Traveler <mysterious.traveler@dot.net> - 2011-04-27 02:20 -0500
csiph-web