Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #939

Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish?

Show all headers | View raw

despen@verizon.net wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
> 
>> despen@verizon.net wrote:
>>> philo <philo@invalid.not> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 04/26/2011 03:43 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> I am trying to make an DVD ISO of a 3.5GB mpeg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Devedee is still going 4 hours later saying 1/4 and 100%.
>>>>>
>>>>> at least 7 GB of mpg has built up in the temporary directory.
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF is happening? will it ever stop? where is the ISO?
>>>> I'd stop it and get rid of any temporary file created
>>>> Personally I use k3b for burning iso burning...
>>>> Unfortunately  many of the other burning apps I've tried just did not it
>>> devede creates isos, not burn them.
>>>
>>> I've had it take a long time but 4 hours is a lot.
>>> It does need a lot of CPU.
>> well its finished BUT it said the size would be 2.3GB. but the actual
>> ISO is 7.3GB!!! WTF is happening?
> 
> Hard to say.
> 
> There are 8.5GB DVDs to put the file on.
> 
> There's an "adjust disk usage" thing that lets you
> control the ultimate ISO file size.

The actual tunable turned out to be 'video bit rate' or something.


The 'adjust disk image' does nothing, it seems.

And the telltale that goes from 0-100% is valueless. It goes to 100% 
about 1/4 of the way through.

This is probably the worst piece of Linux software I have used. But then 
it appears to be written in Python, so no surprises there..

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:43 +0100
  Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-04-26 16:23 -0500
    Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 17:43 -0400
      Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 23:43 +0100
        Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 21:48 -0400
          Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 08:22 +0100
            Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:41 +0000
              Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 17:58 +0100
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:10 -0400
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:18 +0100
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 16:59 -0400
            Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 12:53 -0400
              Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:08 -0400
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:17 +0100
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:05 +0000
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:20 +0100
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
                Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mark Hobley <markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co> - 2011-04-29 21:11 +0000
  Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mysterious Traveler <mysterious.traveler@dot.net> - 2011-04-27 02:20 -0500

csiph-web