Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #949
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? |
| Date | 2011-04-27 18:18 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ip9j59$jet$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <icfwp4v4zx.fsf@verizon.net> <ip8g87$2ni$1@news.albasani.net> <ip8rth$nd6$1@dont-email.me> <ip9huv$g1o$2@news.albasani.net> <icy62vtyb8.fsf@verizon.net> |
despen@verizon.net wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: > >> goarilla wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:22:46 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> despen@verizon.net wrote: >>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> despen@verizon.net wrote: >>>>>>> philo <philo@invalid.not> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 04/26/2011 03:43 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>>> I am trying to make an DVD ISO of a 3.5GB mpeg. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Devedee is still going 4 hours later saying 1/4 and 100%. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> at least 7 GB of mpg has built up in the temporary directory. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WTF is happening? will it ever stop? where is the ISO? >>>>>>>> I'd stop it and get rid of any temporary file created Personally I >>>>>>>> use k3b for burning iso burning... Unfortunately many of the other >>>>>>>> burning apps I've tried just did not it >>>>>>> devede creates isos, not burn them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've had it take a long time but 4 hours is a lot. It does need a lot >>>>>>> of CPU. >>>>>> well its finished BUT it said the size would be 2.3GB. but the actual >>>>>> ISO is 7.3GB!!! WTF is happening? >>>>> Hard to say. >>>>> >>>>> There are 8.5GB DVDs to put the file on. >>>>> >>>>> There's an "adjust disk usage" thing that lets you control the ultimate >>>>> ISO file size. >>>> The actual tunable turned out to be 'video bit rate' or something. >>>> >>>> >>>> The 'adjust disk image' does nothing, it seems. >>>> >>>> And the telltale that goes from 0-100% is valueless. It goes to 100% >>>> about 1/4 of the way through. >>>> >>>> This is probably the worst piece of Linux software I have used. But then >>>> it appears to be written in Python, so no surprises there.. >>> have some quarrel with python or with using scripting languages >>> for heavy GUI apps in general ? >> Both :-) >> >> But its more that the sort of person who choose python, tends to >> be..ahem..an enthusiastic amateur > > Well, I chose Python. > > If starting programming in 1964 makes me an amateur... says nothing about it. Depends what you did in between.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:43 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-04-26 16:23 -0500
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 17:43 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-26 23:43 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-26 21:48 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 08:22 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:41 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 17:58 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:10 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:18 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 16:59 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 12:53 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-27 13:08 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:17 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:05 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:20 +0100
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? despen@verizon.net - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? goarilla <kevin.paulus@mtm.DOTremove-thisDOT.kuleuven.DOTbe.invalid> - 2011-04-29 08:20 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mark Hobley <markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co> - 2011-04-29 21:11 +0000
Re: devede? is t me, or is it rubbish? Mysterious Traveler <mysterious.traveler@dot.net> - 2011-04-27 02:20 -0500
csiph-web