Re: cpufreq* help.

From	Todd <Todd@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: cpufreq* help.
Date	2011-04-22 22:01 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<iotmg7$8id$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<iossat$mt6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <iot1uh$srf$1@dont-email.me> <slrnir4khi.i7f.spamtrap42@one.localnet> <iotl46$n3a$1@dont-email.me> <slrnir4med.i7f.spamtrap42@one.localnet>

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/22/2011 09:47 PM, Robert Riches wrote:
> Look for the word "constant" in the "Characteristics" section of
> this page:
>
>          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emitter-coupled_logic
>
> NMOS and PMOS are also pretty close to constant in current drain,
> largely independent of clock frequency.

Man that was a trip down memory lane!

I interfaced this stuff with RF (Radio Frequency) circuits
back in the day.  Forgot everything I did.  I do remember
the small swings on the logic states.

Thank you.

-T

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

cpufreq* help. "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com> - 2011-04-22 21:35 +0000
  Re: cpufreq* help. Todd <Todd@invalid.com> - 2011-04-22 16:11 -0700
    Re: cpufreq* help. Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-23 04:14 +0000
      Re: cpufreq* help. Todd <Todd@invalid.com> - 2011-04-22 21:38 -0700
        Re: cpufreq* help. Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-23 04:47 +0000
          Re: cpufreq* help. Todd <Todd@invalid.com> - 2011-04-22 22:01 -0700
            Re: cpufreq* help. Todd <Todd@invalid.com> - 2011-04-22 22:04 -0700
              Re: cpufreq* help. Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-04-23 11:37 -0400
                Re: cpufreq* help. Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-04-23 13:22 -0400
  Re: cpufreq* help. Baron <baron@linuxmaniac.net> - 2011-04-23 20:10 +0100

csiph-web