Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #79594
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Underground fires |
| Date | 2025-12-20 19:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1i7j1mx1h9.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <mqjq0eFi0asU1@mid.individual.net> <6lsg1mxg46.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <mqmo5bF2n74U1@mid.individual.net> <7kgi1mxriu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10i6lij$24ra8$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025-12-20 18:14, Paul wrote: > On Sat, 12/20/2025 7:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> >> Garbage should be burnt (if burnt at all) in a high temperature oven with filters for toxic fumes. > > An entrepreneur tried this and eventually gave up. > The process was not clean enough to be used, without consequences. > > Any of the chemists I graduated with, could have told this person it won't work. > > It might have been something like dioxin. There was never a "final report" > or "lessons learned", to put a stop to someone else trying it. Well, there are countries doing it, and they claim to be happy about it. Switzerland, for instance. > > "When plastic burns, it releases a cocktail of harmful chemicals into the air. > These include dioxins, furans, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). > Dioxins, in particular, are known carcinogens and can cause reproductive and > developmental problems, damage the immune system, and interfere with hormones." > > There is a difference between filtering a truly trace chemical, and buckets > of bad stuff coming out the bottom of the rig. > > This is what happens when the consumption method is not at a high enough > temperature. Raising the temperature of the process, increases the > price per ton, of the processing. But humans will "try to burn that shit > with gasoline", and even with a pure oxygen supply for help (dangerous), > the temperature of the output reactants is too low. Only a few combustive > gas mixtures, give relatively high output temperatures, and usually involve > relatively tiny molecules. It's possible an acceptable combustion process > needs three times that temperature, a plasma of some kind maybe. You can't > get there with combustion, it's going to take something a lot more whizzy > (and energy consumptive). > > The Sun would make a good garbage bucket. But you'd have to find an article > that analyzes the consequences (other than the cost per ton of launching > garbage). > > A fusion reactor gets nice and warm. The ignition facility (NIF) in the States > used for fusion research, the target zone there gets nice and warm, but > this is hardly cheap kit to be burning garbage. In the fusion reactor, > you're ruin the containment walls, with discarded tomato sandwich splatter :-) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility#/media/File:NIF_target_chamber_2.jpg > > There are continuing comments in the local news, about "solving our garbage > problem by burning it". I was born in a city that did this, burned garbage > in a relatively low temperature incinerator. I've been to that incinerator > in a pickup truck. The tailgate fell off our truck, into the pit which buffers > the garbage fed into the incinerator. It's 200 feet down. There is a ladder on > the side of the pit, covered in slime, for you to climb down :-) Well, the > crane operator at the pit was a champ. He picked up our tailgate with the > bucket scoop jaws, pulled it up the two hundred feet, and deposited it > on the ground next to the offload area. It was "only a little bit bent". > > That incinerator used to shower us in soot and fallen debris. Any washing > outside, would get covered in debris and need to be washed again. It all > depended on the wind direction, as to who got the "output". > > They don't do that any more. But I bet the politicians reminisce about > how "successful" that operation was. Today, there is a lawn over top of > everything that went on there, and methane vent pipes on the premises. > That garbage today, is like most cities, driven out of town on 40 foot trailers > and such. > > Today, a new town dump costs about $500,000,000 to build, and has a > liner in the bottom to collect toxic fluids. That figure, is what > stokes all this interest in combustion :-) I agree with you, but some people tell me that the EU sanctioned way is an incinerator. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-15 00:57 -0500
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-16 21:42 +0100
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-16 16:29 -0800
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-17 01:09 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-17 01:24 -0500
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-17 06:53 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-18 22:47 +0100
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-17 00:51 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-18 22:46 +0100
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-19 02:01 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-12-19 00:58 -0600
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-19 02:46 -0500
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-19 08:22 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-12-19 13:16 -0600
Underground fires "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-19 22:28 +0100
Re: Underground fires rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-20 04:48 +0000
Re: Underground fires "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 13:15 +0100
Re: Underground fires Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-20 12:14 -0500
Re: Underground fires "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 19:46 +0100
Re: Underground fires Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-20 16:42 -0500
Re: Underground fires "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 23:09 +0100
Re: Underground fires The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:11 +0000
Re: Underground fires rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 01:34 +0000
Burning things. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-26 22:42 +0100
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-21 15:24 -0500
Re: Underground fires rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 23:10 +0000
Re: Underground fires Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-21 15:34 -0800
Re: Underground fires rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-22 06:47 +0000
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-22 02:08 -0500
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-22 01:53 -0500
Re: Underground fires Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-22 21:46 +1100
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-22 07:35 -0500
Re: Underground fires Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-23 21:31 +1100
Re: Underground fires Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-23 06:40 -0500
Re: Underground fires The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 12:41 +0000
Re: Underground fires Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-12-23 21:18 +0000
Re: Underground fires Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-24 20:43 +1100
Re: Underground fires The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 13:12 +0000
Re: Underground fires Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-24 20:26 +1100
OT: Garbage disposal meets rocket science (was: Re: Underground fires) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 11:19 +0000
Re: Underground fires The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 13:04 +0000
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-24 04:55 -0500
Re: Underground fires The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 13:13 +0000
Re: Underground fires Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-23 11:43 -0800
Re: Underground fires pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> - 2025-12-24 09:04 -0800
Re: Underground fires "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-27 12:37 +0100
Re: Underground fires c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-27 11:44 -0500
Toxics... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-26 22:47 +0100
Re: Underground fires Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-21 22:11 +1100
Re: Underground fires rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 20:34 +0000
Re: Shopping carts, baskets, bags... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-19 02:12 -0500
csiph-web