Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #192
| From | Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: I would like to |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.os.linux.embedded |
| References | <4f4f5b48$0$5046$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <eoCdnT8SCbCsLtLSnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@web-ster.com> <o46529-o9k.ln1@llondel.org> <eoCdnTsSCbDsk83SnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@web-ster.com> <jip382$44g$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <sg4d29-vke.ln1@llondel.org> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2012-03-04 21:47 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
hamilton wrote: > On 3/1/2012 5:04 PM, Tim Wescott wrote: >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:26:16 +0000, Dave wrote: >> >>> Tim Wescott wrote: >>> >>> >>>> A plain old PIC. Only 35 easy-to-learn instructions (that used to be >>>> their slogan -- hah). They called it "RISC" processor, but it's really >>>> a NHISC (Never Had an Instruction Set Computer). But -- it's not a bad >>>> processor as long as you never use a decent one. >>>> >>> I'd choose an MSP430 over a PIC, it has the luxury of being 16-bit, too. >>> The AVR processors are fun, too. I've used PICs in the past, but never >>> really gotten on with them. >> >> A 430 wouldn't be a bad choice, either. >> > > What free tools are available for the MSP 430 ?? > > What does a debugger/programmer cost ?? > > A chip is one thing, working with it on hobby projects is another. > Somewhere around here, several layers down in the pile, I have a home-made parallel port MSP430 programmer that works with a Linux dev environment. Not used it for a while, and I've changed my main PC since then and never re- installed the software (but still have the hard drive, again several layers down). Just looked and Olimex do a programmer and publish the circuit too. See http://www.olimex.com/dev/msp-jtag.html That page also has links to how to put together a toolchain. -- Dave Too many gadgets, too little time.
Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-01 12:19 +0100
Re: I would like to "Dennis" <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> - 2012-03-01 19:53 +0800
Re: I would like to pippo2@disney.com (Jack) - 2012-03-01 13:08 +0100
Re: I would like to Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2012-03-01 17:06 +0100
Re: I would like to Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:17 -0600
Re: I would like to Anar <pavel2661@gmail.com> - 2012-03-01 14:26 +0200
Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 07:53 -0700
Re: I would like to Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-03-01 16:07 +0100
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:34 -0600
Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-01 21:26 +0000
Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 17:11 -0700
Re: I would like to Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2012-03-01 16:46 -0800
Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-04 21:47 +0000
Re: I would like to Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-04 22:44 +0000
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 18:04 -0600
Re: I would like to Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-03-02 05:41 +1100
Re: I would like to Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 02:16 +0200
Re: I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-04 16:18 +0100
Re: I would like to rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 14:58 -0800
Re: I would like to mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 17:21 -0800
csiph-web