Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #174
| From | Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.os.linux.embedded |
| Subject | Re: I would like to |
| Followup-To | comp.arch.embedded |
| Date | 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jio9jc$6vo$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4f4f5b48$0$5046$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <LOidnUGtWvKo_tLSnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <1kga4c7.1wsdoap1cblzjeN%pippo2@disney.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.arch.embedded
Jack wrote: > Dennis <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> wrote: >> My personal favorite is the Microchip Pic but others have their >> favorites! >> Microchip have heaps of online support, they're inexpensive, good support >> forums, a free & pretty striaght forward development environment...... > > and one of the worst achitecture ever (wella actually was good 30 years > ago)... True. For the 1970's. Even in the 1990's they were the fastest things we could get for the money. But if you're working through a C compiler you don't have to care. A design called for an Internet-controlled device driver. I prototyped in C for ATMega128 and a Wiznet module. The client didn't use AVR, so they ported the program to PIC16 (I think it was, could have been PIC18.) Before production they had re-ported to PIC32 with its own TCP/IP stack. The C app went through it all unchanged, except for a few lines in specific device routines. I guess the last port was helped by the Wiznet emulating software sockets as well as it did. Mel.
Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-01 12:19 +0100
Re: I would like to "Dennis" <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> - 2012-03-01 19:53 +0800
Re: I would like to pippo2@disney.com (Jack) - 2012-03-01 13:08 +0100
Re: I would like to Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2012-03-01 17:06 +0100
Re: I would like to Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:17 -0600
Re: I would like to Anar <pavel2661@gmail.com> - 2012-03-01 14:26 +0200
Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 07:53 -0700
Re: I would like to Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-03-01 16:07 +0100
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:34 -0600
Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-01 21:26 +0000
Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 17:11 -0700
Re: I would like to Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2012-03-01 16:46 -0800
Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-04 21:47 +0000
Re: I would like to Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-04 22:44 +0000
Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 18:04 -0600
Re: I would like to Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-03-02 05:41 +1100
Re: I would like to Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 02:16 +0200
Re: I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-04 16:18 +0100
Re: I would like to rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 14:58 -0800
Re: I would like to mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 17:21 -0800
csiph-web