Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #174

Re: I would like to

From Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded, comp.os.linux.embedded
Subject Re: I would like to
Followup-To comp.arch.embedded
Date 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <jio9jc$6vo$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <4f4f5b48$0$5046$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <LOidnUGtWvKo_tLSnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <1kga4c7.1wsdoap1cblzjeN%pippo2@disney.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.arch.embedded

Show all headers | View raw


Jack wrote:
> Dennis <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> wrote:
>> My personal favorite is the Microchip Pic but others have their
>> favorites!
>> Microchip have heaps of online support, they're inexpensive, good support
>> forums, a free & pretty striaght forward development environment......
> 
> and one of the worst achitecture ever (wella actually was good 30 years
> ago)...
True.  For the 1970's.  Even in the 1990's they were the fastest things we 
could get for the money.

But if you're working through a C compiler you don't have to care.  A design 
called for an Internet-controlled device driver.  I prototyped in C for 
ATMega128 and a Wiznet module.  The client didn't use AVR, so they ported 
the program to PIC16 (I think it was, could have been PIC18.)  Before 
production they had re-ported to PIC32 with its own TCP/IP stack.  The C app 
went through it all unchanged, except for a few lines in specific device 
routines.  I guess the last port was helped by the Wiznet emulating software 
sockets as well as it did.

	Mel.

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-01 12:19 +0100
  Re: I would like to "Dennis" <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> - 2012-03-01 19:53 +0800
    Re: I would like to pippo2@disney.com (Jack) - 2012-03-01 13:08 +0100
      Re: I would like to Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2012-03-01 17:06 +0100
      Re: I would like to Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500
      Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:17 -0600
    Re: I would like to Anar <pavel2661@gmail.com> - 2012-03-01 14:26 +0200
  Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 07:53 -0700
    Re: I would like to Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-03-01 16:07 +0100
  Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:34 -0600
    Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-01 21:26 +0000
      Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 17:11 -0700
        Re: I would like to Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2012-03-01 16:46 -0800
        Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-04 21:47 +0000
        Re: I would like to Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-04 22:44 +0000
      Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 18:04 -0600
  Re: I would like to Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-03-02 05:41 +1100
  Re: I would like to Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 02:16 +0200
  Re: I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-04 16:18 +0100
    Re: I would like to rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 14:58 -0800
  Re: I would like to mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 17:21 -0800

csiph-web