Re: I would like to

From	Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.arch.embedded, comp.os.linux.embedded
Subject	Re: I would like to
Date	2012-03-01 16:46 -0800
Organization	Highland Technology, Inc.
Message-ID	<20120301164610.1ecdc31c@rg.highlandtechnology.com> (permalink)
References	<4f4f5b48$0$5046$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <eoCdnT8SCbCsLtLSnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@web-ster.com> <o46529-o9k.ln1@llondel.org> <eoCdnTsSCbDsk83SnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@web-ster.com> <jip382$44g$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:11:43 -0700
hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/1/2012 5:04 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:26:16 +0000, Dave wrote:
> >
> >> Tim Wescott wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> A plain old PIC.  Only 35 easy-to-learn instructions (that used to be
> >>> their slogan -- hah).  They called it "RISC" processor, but it's really
> >>> a NHISC (Never Had an Instruction Set Computer).  But -- it's not a bad
> >>> processor as long as you never use a decent one.
> >>>
> >> I'd choose an MSP430 over a PIC, it has the luxury of being 16-bit, too.
> >> The AVR processors are fun, too. I've used PICs in the past, but never
> >> really gotten on with them.
> >
> > A 430 wouldn't be a bad choice, either.
> >
> 
> What free tools are available for the MSP 430 ??
> 
> What does a debugger/programmer cost ??
> 
> A chip is one thing, working with it on hobby projects is another.
> 
> thanks
> 
> hamilton
> 

That would be http://e2e.ti.com/group/msp430launchpad/w/default.aspx

The lil'est dev kit goes for $4.30, but TI's out of stock.  If you want
them for real you have to pay Digikey's markup to $4.35


-- 
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order.  See above to fix.

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-01 12:19 +0100
  Re: I would like to "Dennis" <jon.dough@ithemorgue.com> - 2012-03-01 19:53 +0800
    Re: I would like to pippo2@disney.com (Jack) - 2012-03-01 13:08 +0100
      Re: I would like to Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2012-03-01 17:06 +0100
      Re: I would like to Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2012-03-01 11:53 -0500
      Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:17 -0600
    Re: I would like to Anar <pavel2661@gmail.com> - 2012-03-01 14:26 +0200
  Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 07:53 -0700
    Re: I would like to Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-03-01 16:07 +0100
  Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 11:34 -0600
    Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-01 21:26 +0000
      Re: I would like to hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-01 17:11 -0700
        Re: I would like to Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2012-03-01 16:46 -0800
        Re: I would like to Dave <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-03-04 21:47 +0000
        Re: I would like to Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-04 22:44 +0000
      Re: I would like to Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2012-03-01 18:04 -0600
  Re: I would like to Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-03-02 05:41 +1100
  Re: I would like to Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 02:16 +0200
  Re: I would like to Andre <pas.mois@ailleur.be> - 2012-03-04 16:18 +0100
    Re: I would like to rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 14:58 -0800
  Re: I would like to mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 17:21 -0800

csiph-web