Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31608 > unrolled thread

More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks!

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-09 20:49 +0200
    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-09 20:38 +0000
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-09 17:40 -0400
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 16:58 -0500
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 18:50 -0400
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 19:50 -0500
            Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-09 21:11 -0400
              Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:02 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 08:23 +0000
                  Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:50 +0200
                    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:18 -0400
                  Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:08 -0400
                    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 07:26 -0500
                      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:08 +0200
                    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:40 -0500
                      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-10 13:46 +0100
                        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:09 +0200
                        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:38 -0500
                      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 09:33 -0400
                        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:51 +0200
                      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:50 +0200
                        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:19 +0200
                      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0400
                        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0400
            Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:06 +0200
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:43 -0700
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-09 23:49 +0100
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:17 +0200
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:52 +0000
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 11:52 -0500
            Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:54 -0400
            Re: More solid proof that "chrisv" is a useless piece of shit. "Hannibal Pointdexter" <run@invalid.com> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#31608 — More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks!

Hi "advocates", here is more solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks!

http://www.youtube.com/user/LiEnucksFAILS
[q]
I am the ALL TIME #1 ranked owner of the LiEnucks morons & the Apple 
iSlaves. LOL
Lenucks shall henceforth be known as LiENUCKS. For obvious reasons:
It LiES 'N' SUCKS = LiENUCKS
LiEnucks Morons' HALL OF SHAME:
http://bit.ly/jn7LUM
(Last updated: 13/5/2011)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail boxes. 
LOL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IQ Comparison:
Normal person: 100
Apple Fanboi: 70
LIEnucks Moron: 50
Fucked_Duck: 0.090
Frankie the Fag: 0.001
Dead animal: 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Presenting: The LiEnucks Moron's Video Making Guide - Version 1.00:
http://bit.ly/gUg0cn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ultimate LIEnucks/Mac OS X Ownage Center - IS HERE!
Extensive gaming benchmarks: Mac OS X 10.6.3 vs. Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 
Benchmarks. Windows 7 smokes the competition!
http://bit.ly/9O4OeD
Windows 7 beats LIEnucks at every gaming and graphics benchmark, with up to 
41% faster performance: http://bit.ly/9yUWCZ
Windows 7 consumes between 54% to 65% less power than LIEnucks on a Netbook: 
http://bit.ly/fvBxJk
Windows 7 400% faster while using Flash 10 than LiENucks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aof9D7Z2EbQ
Windows 7's predecessor, Vista, 250% faster while using Flash 10 than 
LIEnucks: http://bit.ly/136Kib
Windows 7 boots up almost twice as fast as Mac OS X on the new Google CR-48 
Netbook:
http://bit.ly/i4mXeT
http://bit.ly/ibiEhN
{Times: Win7@23.7s; OSX@40.1s
Credit to Crashbndcoot121}
Windows 7 85% faster while running Portal on the same hardware as Mac OS X
http://bit.ly/9lDDUz
Windows 7 upto 103% faster while running Half Life 2: Episode 2 than Mac OS 
X on Apple's OWN hardware:
http://bit.ly/9J61sH
WINDOWS 7 FTW
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Security: Windows 7/Vista vs. OS X:
Pwn2Own General Guide: http://bit.ly/fopvFK
2008:http://bit.ly/d7xf9n
1- Mac OS X FIRST to be hacked in less than 2 minutes
2- Vista only hacked one day later when the organizers of the challenge 
changed the rules and made the machine easier to break into, by adding a 
variety of third-party applications, including Acrobat Reader, Flash Player, 
Firefox, and Skype.
2009:http://bit.ly/ZikOM
1-Mac OS X FIRST to be hacked again in less than 10 SECONDS
2-Windows 7 with Chrome was never hacked
2010: http://bit.ly/cJ3KR4
1-Mac OS X FIRST to be hacked yet again
2-Windows 7 with Chrome was never hacked
2011: http://bit.ly/hUNgC0
1-Mac OS X FIRST to be hacked yet again IN UNDER 5 SECONDS
2-Windows 7 with Chrome was never hacked, yet again: http://bit.ly/fusB72
Further Proof that Chrome is Unhackable on Windows 7:
http://bit.ly/dkhuJz
http://bit.ly/cJ3KR4
[q/] 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#31654

Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:

> Hi "advocates", here is more solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks!
> http://www.youtube.com/user/LiEnucksFAILS [q]

Oh hi, is that your youtube account?
If so, you may want to explain, why you deleted my comments, insulted me 
and banned me from writing further comments and failed to provide a 
proper reason for any of these actions when asked via PM?

> I am the ALL TIME #1 ranked

by whom?

> ...
> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail
> boxes. LOL.

So I must be a wizard?

chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
 22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14, 0.22
chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
 22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.15

> ...

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Presenting: The LiEnucks Moron's Video Making Guide - Version 1.00:
> http://bit.ly/gUg0cn

Of course you want the gnome-system-monitor to be always open because you 
_know_ that this is a very ressource consuming tool. Yes, this needs 
fixing. But it will eat CPU time much needed for benchmarks.



I was going to write some further comments but if you really are the same 
person I wouldn't get serious answes anyway so I just let it go.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31679

Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:
>
>> LIE
>
>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail
>> boxes. LOL.
>
> So I must be a wizard?
>
> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
>  22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14, 0.22
> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
>  22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.15

17:38:28 up 179 days,  4:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.04, 0.01

64-bit Debian.

-- 
Huh? I said negative things about the 64 bit SW because it was
crap. Stuck with and was happy with 32 bit. Meanwhile "advocates" lied
through their teeth pretending it (64bit) "all just worked". It didn't
then and it doesn't now for many.
Grow up you whining little apologist.
   -- "Hadron" <huvtju$g8k$1@news.eternal-september.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31694

On 2011-06-09, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:
> Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:
>>
>>> LIE
>>
>>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail
>>> boxes. LOL.
>>
>> So I must be a wizard?
>>
>> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
>>  22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14, 0.22
>> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
>>  22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.15
>
> 17:38:28 up 179 days,  4:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.04, 0.01
>
> 64-bit Debian.

   Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
ESC . (^[.)              
   CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
EXIT          
   ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
reformat   ^KX save      
   ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
center     ^C  abort     
   Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
ESC . (^[.)              
   CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
EXIT          
   ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
reformat   ^KX save      
   ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
center     ^C  abort     
   ^Z previous word   ^A  beg. of line   ^KM move     ^W >word   ^T
options    ^KZ shell     
   ^X next word       ^E  end of line    ^KC copy     ^O word<   ^R
refresh    FILE          
   SEARCH             ^KU top of file    ^KW file     ^J >line   SPELL
^KE edit      
   ^KF find text      ^KV end of file    ^KY delete   ^_ undo    ^[N
word       ^KR insert    
   ^L  find next      ^KL to line No.    ^K/ filter   ^^ redo    ^[L
file       ^KD save      
    IW   ~/.followup (Modified)(mail)                Row 29   Col 1
4:56  Ctrl-K H for help
>
>> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:
>>
>>> LIE
>>
>>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks
>>> fail
>>> boxes. LOL.
>>
>> So I must be a wizard?
>>
>> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
>>  22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14,
>> 0.22
>> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
>>  22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03,
>> 0.15
>
> 17:38:28 up 179 days,  4:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.04,
> 0.01
>
> 64-bit Debian.
 
16:56:33 up 1 day, 13:37,  3 users,  load average: 0.35, 0.33, 0.32

We had some power dropouts night before last. Prior to that it was
around 85 days, which was the last time we lost power long enough to
kill it.

-- 
Man has his will. Woman has her won't!
Aspire One, Ubuntu 11.04
Friends don't let friends use Windows

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31732

On 6/9/2011 5:58 PM, Sinister Midget III wrote:
> On 2011-06-09, Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  claimed:
>> Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:
>>>
>>>> LIE
>>>
>>>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail
>>>> boxes. LOL.
>>>
>>> So I must be a wizard?
>>>
>>> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
>>>   22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14, 0.22
>>> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
>>>   22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.15
>>
>> 17:38:28 up 179 days,  4:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.04, 0.01
>>
>> 64-bit Debian.
>
>     Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
> ESC . (^[.)
>     CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
> EXIT
>     ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
> reformat   ^KX save
>     ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
> center     ^C  abort
>     Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
> ESC . (^[.)
>     CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
> EXIT
>     ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
> reformat   ^KX save
>     ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
> center     ^C  abort
>     ^Z previous word   ^A  beg. of line   ^KM move     ^W>word   ^T
> options    ^KZ shell
>     ^X next word       ^E  end of line    ^KC copy     ^O word<    ^R
> refresh    FILE
>     SEARCH             ^KU top of file    ^KW file     ^J>line   SPELL
> ^KE edit
>     ^KF find text      ^KV end of file    ^KY delete   ^_ undo    ^[N
> word       ^KR insert
>     ^L  find next      ^KL to line No.    ^K/ filter   ^^ redo    ^[L
> file       ^KD save
>      IW   ~/.followup (Modified)(mail)                Row 29   Col 1
> 4:56  Ctrl-K H for help
>>
>>> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE:
>>>
>>>> LIE
>>>
>>>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks
>>>> fail
>>>> boxes. LOL.
>>>
>>> So I must be a wizard?
>>>
>>> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime
>>>   22:20:19 up 2 days,  2:11,  0 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.14,
>>> 0.22
>>> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime
>>>   22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43,  4 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03,
>>> 0.15
>>
>> 17:38:28 up 179 days,  4:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.04,
>> 0.01
>>
>> 64-bit Debian.
>
> 16:56:33 up 1 day, 13:37,  3 users,  load average: 0.35, 0.33, 0.32
>
> We had some power dropouts night before last. Prior to that it was
> around 85 days, which was the last time we lost power long enough to
> kill it.


Another idiot Gidget post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31758

On 2011-06-09, Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> claimed:

>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
> ESC . (^[.)              
>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
> EXIT          
>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
> reformat   ^KX save      
>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
> center     ^C  abort     
>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
> ESC . (^[.)              
>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
> EXIT          
>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
> reformat   ^KX save      
>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
> center     ^C  abort     
>    ^Z previous word   ^A  beg. of line   ^KM move     ^W >word   ^T
> options    ^KZ shell     
>    ^X next word       ^E  end of line    ^KC copy     ^O word<   ^R
> refresh    FILE          
>    SEARCH             ^KU top of file    ^KW file     ^J >line   SPELL
> ^KE edit      
>    ^KF find text      ^KV end of file    ^KY delete   ^_ undo    ^[N
> word       ^KR insert    
>    ^L  find next      ^KL to line No.    ^K/ filter   ^^ redo    ^[L
> file       ^KD save      
>     IW   ~/.followup (Modified)(mail)                Row 29   Col 1
> 4:56  Ctrl-K H for help

Cripes! It did it again!

I'm going to have to look into this. I'm not going to give up slrn, but
Imight have to look into another way of using it (currently via a ssh
tunnel) until I get this sorted.

-- 
A new standard in obfuscation, ambiguity, & equivocation.
Aspire One, Ubuntu 11.04
Friends don't let friends use Windows

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31760

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:50:22 -0500, Sinister Midget III wrote:

> On 2011-06-09, Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> claimed:
> 
>>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
>> ESC . (^[.)              
>>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
>> EXIT          
>>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
>> reformat   ^KX save      
>>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
>> center     ^C  abort     
>>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
>> ESC . (^[.)              
>>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
>> EXIT          
>>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
>> reformat   ^KX save      
>>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
>> center     ^C  abort     
>>    ^Z previous word   ^A  beg. of line   ^KM move     ^W >word   ^T
>> options    ^KZ shell     
>>    ^X next word       ^E  end of line    ^KC copy     ^O word<   ^R
>> refresh    FILE          
>>    SEARCH             ^KU top of file    ^KW file     ^J >line   SPELL
>> ^KE edit      
>>    ^KF find text      ^KV end of file    ^KY delete   ^_ undo    ^[N
>> word       ^KR insert    
>>    ^L  find next      ^KL to line No.    ^K/ filter   ^^ redo    ^[L
>> file       ^KD save      
>>     IW   ~/.followup (Modified)(mail)                Row 29   Col 1
>> 4:56  Ctrl-K H for help
> 
> Cripes! It did it again!
> 
> I'm going to have to look into this. I'm not going to give up slrn, but
> Imight have to look into another way of using it (currently via a ssh
> tunnel) until I get this sorted.

Like DFS says, slit em' lengthwise and put yourself out of your misery.

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/

Linux's dismal desktop market share:

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html 

Desktop Linux on Life Support:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31795

flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> writes:

> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:50:22 -0500, Sinister Midget III wrote:
>
>> On 2011-06-09, Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> claimed:
>> 
>>>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
>>> ESC . (^[.)              
>>>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
>>> EXIT          
>>>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
>>> reformat   ^KX save      
>>>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
>>> center     ^C  abort     
>>>    Help Screen                   turn off with ^KH    more help with
>>> ESC . (^[.)              
>>>    CURSOR             GO TO              BLOCK        DELETE     MISC
>>> EXIT          
>>>    ^B left ^F right   ^U  prev. screen   ^KB begin    ^D char.   ^KJ
>>> reformat   ^KX save      
>>>    ^P up   ^N down    ^V  next screen    ^KK end      ^Y line    ^KA
>>> center     ^C  abort     
>>>    ^Z previous word   ^A  beg. of line   ^KM move     ^W >word   ^T
>>> options    ^KZ shell     
>>>    ^X next word       ^E  end of line    ^KC copy     ^O word<   ^R
>>> refresh    FILE          
>>>    SEARCH             ^KU top of file    ^KW file     ^J >line   SPELL
>>> ^KE edit      
>>>    ^KF find text      ^KV end of file    ^KY delete   ^_ undo    ^[N
>>> word       ^KR insert    
>>>    ^L  find next      ^KL to line No.    ^K/ filter   ^^ redo    ^[L
>>> file       ^KD save      
>>>     IW   ~/.followup (Modified)(mail)                Row 29   Col 1
>>> 4:56  Ctrl-K H for help
>> 
>> Cripes! It did it again!
>> 
>> I'm going to have to look into this. I'm not going to give up slrn, but
>> Imight have to look into another way of using it (currently via a ssh
>> tunnel) until I get this sorted.
>
> Like DFS says, slit em' lengthwise and put yourself out of your misery.

"ssh tunnel" lol!

Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31798

Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:02:29 +0200 schrieb Hadron:

> "ssh tunnel" lol!
> 
> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!

If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?

I use one too...

ssh marvin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de -L 1119:news.informatik.uni-
stuttgart.de:119 -N

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31799

Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> writes:

> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:02:29 +0200 schrieb Hadron:
>
>> "ssh tunnel" lol!
>> 
>> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!
>
> If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?
>
> I use one too...
>
> ssh marvin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de -L 1119:news.informatik.uni-
> stuttgart.de:119 -N

You snipped relevant material.

You make my point exactly.

Its like saying "I drive my car, using the accelator, to go to work".

Its affectation and mostly used wrong in this ng.

Before you say any more I use ssh all day and evey day not least with
rsync, tmux and git. I dont specifially set up multi port "tunnels" (in
the true sense) although I have done.

Its like the recent fad to wax lyrical bout sweety pie Puppy. LOL! Did
Koehlmann get another slap down on that one!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31900

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:50:07 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> writes:
> 
>> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:02:29 +0200 schrieb Hadron:
>>
>>> "ssh tunnel" lol!
>>> 
>>> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!
>>
>> If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?
>>
>> I use one too...
>>
>> ssh marvin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de -L 1119:news.informatik.uni-
>> stuttgart.de:119 -N
> 
> You snipped relevant material.

That's his method.
A lot like Gooblin in fact.

 

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/

Linux's dismal desktop market share:

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html 

Desktop Linux on Life Support:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31801

Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:02:29 +0200 schrieb Hadron:
>
>> "ssh tunnel" lol!
>> 
>> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!
>
> If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?
>
> I use one too...

Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.

Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D

-- 
You read should read the threads about Tom's ssh usage. And his lame
attempt at wriggling out by saying I was wrong when I said ....
   -- "Hadron" <hil89k$5ob$3@hadron.eternal-september.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31821

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Chris wrote:
>
>> schrieb Hadron:
>>
>>> "ssh tunnel" lol!
>>> 
>>> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!
>>
>> If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?
>>
>> I use one too...
>
>Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>
>Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D

Well, it gets "Hadron" thinking about Flatfish's "tunnel", you know.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31874

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> schreef in bericht 
news:2a34v6hg5ogo31o3cptaq7g28tg51elsf9@4ax.com...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>
>>> schrieb Hadron:
>>>
>>>> "ssh tunnel" lol!
>>>>
>>>> Can no one mention ssh without "tunnel" these days!
>>>
>>> If it _is_ a ssh tunnel why call it otherwise?
>>>
>>> I use one too...
>>
>>Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>
>>Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>>subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>
> Well, it gets "Hadron" thinking about Flatfish's "tunnel", you know.
>

<stalk>
chrisv - at least 9 years of vile-moutheded hypocricy who makes a living 
with Windows - rants
and froths and screams curses here daily - obsessed with Zeke - pretends
to love Linux/OSS/open standards but uses Windows to make money -
submitted a single post which included: "Fsck you... snotty POS...
asshole... worthless waste of skin... you suck shit... God-damned...
fsckwit... Wintroll fsckwits." 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31824

On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:

> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>
> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D

Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.

I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
drink and die in his vomit. Without every experiencing the joys of a
ssh tunnel.

-- 
Friends don't let friends ride JUNK!
Aspire One, Ubuntu 11.04
Friends don't let friends use Windows

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31829

In reply to Sinister Midget who posted:

> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:
>
>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>
>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>
> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>
> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
> drink and die in his vomit. Without every experiencing the joys of a
> ssh tunnel.

LMAO!

-- 
"!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW"
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31876

"William Poaster" <wp@induh-vidual.net> schreef in bericht 
news:o9g9c8-ise.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
> In reply to Sinister Midget who posted:
>
>> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:
>>
>>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>>
>>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>>
>> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
>> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
>> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>>
>> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
>> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
>> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
>> drink and die in his vomit. Without every experiencing the joys of a
>> ssh tunnel.
>
> LMAO!
>
Dumb Willie Poaster - at least 7 straight years where ~99% of his posts
are about "trolls" and "me too" and nothing else - makes up fictitious
claims about MS SEC filings. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31887

On 2011-06-10, William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> claimed:
> In reply to Sinister Midget who posted:
>
>> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:
>>
>>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>>
>>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>>
>> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
>> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
>> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>>
>> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
>> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
>> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
>> drink and die in his vomit. Without every experiencing the joys of a
>> ssh tunnel.
>
> LMAO!

Are you a Ssh Tunnel Club member, too? I personally think most everybdy
should be. Except the severely retarded trolls.

-- 
Mistakes are often the stepping stones to utter failure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31838

On 6/10/2011 8:40 AM, Sinister Midget wrote:
> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  claimed:
>
>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>
>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>
> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>
> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
> drink and die in his vomit.


Hadron, I'll give you a while to put it to this Gidget loser before I 
step in.



> Without every experiencing the joys of a
> ssh tunnel.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31846

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:

> On 6/10/2011 8:40 AM, Sinister Midget wrote:
>> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  claimed:
>>
>>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>>
>>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>>
>> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
>> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
>> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>>
>> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
>> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
>> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
>> drink and die in his vomit.
>
> Hadron, I'll give you a while to put it to this Gidget loser before I step in.
>

Go ahead. I'm having a bad business day and am not in the mood to slap
him around with the vigour his retardity deserves.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web