Re: OT: spam phone calls

From	Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups	uk.telecom.mobile, alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: OT: spam phone calls
Followup-To	uk.telecom.mobile
Date	2025-04-29 15:35 +0100
Organization	Frantic
Message-ID	<86h627jase.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <vt7vod$2joqk$3@dont-email.me> <vuoggg$3s4hj$2@dont-email.me> <vuopoe$4915$1@dont-email.me> <u1n6elxbpn.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <m7brrjFbve7U1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: uk.telecom.mobile

Show all headers | View raw

Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> writes:

> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-28 22:51, knuttle wrote:
>>> On 04/28/2025 2:13 PM, Davey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:33:17 +0100 snip > Yup, the Norton one I
>>> receive also. I am on Linux as well, and have > also been since
>>> 2010.
>>>> 
>>> This is how you handle spam phone calls
>>> 
>>> https://www.facebook.com/reel/536662662814345
>>> 
>>> If the link does not work Earl answers the phone "Hello Sheriff's
>>> department, Fraud division.  Who is calling."
>> 
>> That might backfire; you might be sued for impersonating the police.
>
> Sued by whom?
>
> There’s only two parties to the call, and neither wants to involve the
> police.

How do you know there are only two parties to the call?

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: OT: spam phone calls JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2025-04-10 09:16 +0100
  Re: OT: spam phone calls Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-04-10 09:33 +0100
    Re: OT: spam phone calls JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2025-04-10 14:40 +0100
      Re: OT: spam phone calls Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-04-29 21:23 +1000
    Re: OT: spam phone calls Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-04-28 19:13 +0100
      Re: OT: spam phone calls AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-04-28 18:59 +0000
        Re: OT: spam phone calls Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-04-29 18:37 +0000
          Browser lockup and other various subjects... AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-04-29 21:49 +0000
            Re: Browser lockup and other various subjects... Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-04-30 14:43 +0000
              Re: Browser lockup and other various subjects... AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-04-30 16:39 +0000
                Re: Browser lockup and other various subjects... Siard <xx@xx.invalid> - 2025-04-30 23:24 +0200
                Re: Browser lockup and other various subjects... AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-04-30 22:00 +0000
      Re: OT: spam phone calls David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2025-04-28 21:19 +0100
      Re: OT: spam phone calls knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-28 16:51 -0400
        Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-29 12:42 +0200
          Re: OT: spam phone calls Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> - 2025-04-29 11:35 +0000
            Re: OT: spam phone calls Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-04-29 15:35 +0100
              Re: OT: spam phone calls Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> - 2025-04-29 15:06 +0000
                Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-29 20:15 +0200
            Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-29 20:17 +0200
          Re: OT: spam phone calls JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2025-04-29 12:57 +0100

csiph-web