Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: OT: spam phone calls
Followup-To: uk.telecom.mobile
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:35:13 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <86h627jase.fsf@example.com>
References: <vrh0k4$36vfn$1@dont-email.me> <vrhhf5$3li94$1@dont-email.me> <vrjj8j$1efgk$1@dont-email.me> <mv30blx3h2.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vt32s7$2628d$1@dont-email.me> <vt33nb$24gb9$1@dont-email.me> <vt366j$28v73$1@dont-email.me> <67f5882a$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vt5j44$f311$1@dont-email.me> <vt7upq$2i6vb$6@dont-email.me> <vt7vod$2joqk$3@dont-email.me> <vuoggg$3s4hj$2@dont-email.me> <vuopoe$4915$1@dont-email.me> <u1n6elxbpn.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <m7brrjFbve7U1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="44114"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9QB4MLrR+mBSxJSDgdBBTxjZ2TM= sha1:vlIAKyJwXsJafPKpFQcXlLAi480=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYkBwEAEBMCWcCzKEU//JWTGHhjtCoPa2Xl81II+5Yxavk27kVgRHgSdkACdbah55T8c7BEK
Xref: csiph.com uk.telecom.mobile:46193 alt.comp.os.windows-10:184152 comp.mobile.android:148239

Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> writes:

> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-28 22:51, knuttle wrote:
>>> On 04/28/2025 2:13 PM, Davey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:33:17 +0100 snip > Yup, the Norton one I
>>> receive also. I am on Linux as well, and have > also been since
>>> 2010.
>>>> 
>>> This is how you handle spam phone calls
>>> 
>>> https://www.facebook.com/reel/536662662814345
>>> 
>>> If the link does not work Earl answers the phone "Hello Sheriff's
>>> department, Fraud division.  Who is calling."
>> 
>> That might backfire; you might be sued for impersonating the police.
>
> Sued by whom?
>
> There’s only two parties to the call, and neither wants to involve the
> police.

How do you know there are only two parties to the call?