Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | wetdaemon@bsd.box |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy |
| Date | 2015-04-23 18:31 +0000 |
| Organization | PNW Cat Herders Assoc. |
| Message-ID | <mhbdpf$3ra$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mhb72r$glp$1@news.xmission.com> |
> Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy > > From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) > Reply to: Kenny McCormack > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:36:43 +0000 (UTC) > Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium > Newsgroups: > comp.misc > Followup to: newsgroup > References: > <QOc5FV9PB+hKPuHVXFkColfO@dont-email.me> >In article <QOc5FV9PB+hKPuHVXFkColfO@dont-email.me>, >Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >... >> the culture. IBM's philosophy covered its business practices and how >> employees, customers, and suppliers were to be treated. The IBM prime >> directive, as it were, was to treat everyone fairly, with respect and >> dignity. > >This kind of begs the question: Are there any companies that don't have >this as their philosophy? > >I.e., are there any companies whose prime directive is to >treat everyone unfairly, with disrespect and with a lack of dignity? If there are they are doing it through Republican politicians via the various "Religious Freedom Protection/Restoration" laws past and/or pending in several US states. Seems very similar to all those "Defense of Marriage" laws enacted not long ago and mostly toppled over, as these laws soon will be. Inclusion usually wins in the end.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
The impact of the Linux philosophy Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-03-15 21:58 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Dario Niedermann <dnied@tiscali.it> - 2015-03-16 16:02 +0100
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-03-16 14:45 -0400
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-16 23:58 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy DD <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2015-03-16 17:56 -0700
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-17 08:25 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-03-17 23:12 -0300
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Chuck Martin <cmartin+usenet@nyx.net> - 2015-03-18 08:32 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-03-18 11:41 -0300
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-03-18 16:19 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-18 20:58 +0100
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-19 06:25 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-03-16 23:34 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-23 16:36 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy wetdaemon@bsd.box - 2015-04-23 18:31 +0000
csiph-web