Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy |
| Date | 2015-03-16 14:45 -0400 |
| Organization | National Capital Freenet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1503161444050.18220@darkstar.example.org> (permalink) |
| References | <QOc5FV9PB+hKPuHVXFkColfO@dont-email.me> <Linux-20150316145909@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Stefan Ram wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> What is the Linux philosophy > > I'd say, the UNIX philosophy is to create small building > blocks that do one thing well and then provide tools to > combine them for specific applications and tools to save > such combinations for later reuse. (I don't know Linux well, > so I replaced it by »UNIX« in the previous sentence.) > However, that philosophy is not limited to UNIX, it also > is the philosophy of computer programming, so the UNIX > philosphy might be to provide a shell for programmer users, > for people who are willing and able to read man pages. > > However, today, one must also see the difference between > the operating system and a shell. Tools, such as »sort« > used to be part of »the UNIX UI«, but Linux today also > supports GUIs that do not allow usage of such tools anymore > (except by opening a text shell). So, what is the > philosophy of the Linux kernel, that what actually is > Linux beyond any of the changing different UIs and > different distributions? I don't know! Maybe it was > »try to imitate UNIX« once, but I don't know if that > is still valid today. > > Andyet, some of the GUI "programs" are mostly interface to command line programs. The GUI is just another type of shell. YOu don't have to run it, you can turn it off and still have the rest. That contrasts with MS WIndows where now it's all an integrated package. Michael
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The impact of the Linux philosophy Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-03-15 21:58 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Dario Niedermann <dnied@tiscali.it> - 2015-03-16 16:02 +0100
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-03-16 14:45 -0400
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-16 23:58 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy DD <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2015-03-16 17:56 -0700
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-17 08:25 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-03-17 23:12 -0300
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Chuck Martin <cmartin+usenet@nyx.net> - 2015-03-18 08:32 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-03-18 11:41 -0300
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-03-18 16:19 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-18 20:58 +0100
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-19 06:25 +0200
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-03-16 23:34 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-04-23 16:36 +0000
Re: The impact of the Linux philosophy wetdaemon@bsd.box - 2015-04-23 18:31 +0000
csiph-web