Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #26072

big thanks to

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to>
Newsgroups comp.unix.programmer, comp.misc, comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject big thanks to
Followup-To comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:18:52 -0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 37
Message-ID <87a5e93j1v.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Fri, 08 Nov 2024 15:18:53 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="0ce90ff5ab76d8fd78c052ae41c9ffd2"; logging-data="3399516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19i1etQw4FKNX8/oo7tm9CdbkIFhCHx2W0="
Cancel-Lock sha1:1OqiJy3ghTr4XklLCSw93oCLhtk= sha1:XZGK8D6QpxfhpuROUFAFtIkK8FI=
Xref csiph.com comp.unix.programmer:16470 comp.misc:26072 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:4081

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc

Show key headers only | View raw


I wanted to send a 

  BIG THANKS 

to 

  Jan Mojžíš

for having written

  https://github.com/janmojzis/tlswrapper

which is a TLS wrapper written in the UNIX way.  I've been looking for a
program like that for a little while to be able to continue to use
Daniel J. Bernstein's tcpserver (wrapped in TLS).

And another thank-you for the fact that tlswrapper can read a single
file including the full chain of certificates and the private key of the
server.

(*) FreeBSD

I could not find a precompiled package of tlswrapper in FreeBSD's pkg
collection.  Perhaps I should make that contribution.

(*) The ucspi-ssl package

There's sslserver from the ucspi-ssl package at 

  https://www.fehcom.de/ipnet/ucspi-ssl.html

but it hasn't been easy to compile it.

(*) inetd and xinetd

I did look at the current state of affairs of inetd and xinetd and it
looks like they ignore TLS completely.  Perhaps they shouldn't?

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

big thanks to Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-08 11:18 -0300
  Re: big thanks to Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-08 21:16 +0000
    Re: big thanks to Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-08 20:45 -0300

csiph-web