Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.unix.programmer, comp.misc, comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc |
| Subject | Re: big thanks to |
| Followup-To | comp.misc |
| Date | 2024-11-08 20:45 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87cyj5xpao.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink) |
| References | <87a5e93j1v.fsf@jemoni.to> <vglv3q$3bsio$4@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.misc
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: D> On Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:18:52 -0300, Wolfgang Agnes wrote: > >> (*) inetd and xinetd >> >> I did look at the current state of affairs of inetd and xinetd and it >> looks like they ignore TLS completely. Perhaps they shouldn't? > > If you look at the tlswrapper docs, you’ll see that it can be invoked via > inetd (or systemd), and it in turn wraps the actual service process. That makes sense.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
big thanks to Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-08 11:18 -0300
Re: big thanks to Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-08 21:16 +0000
Re: big thanks to Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-08 20:45 -0300
csiph-web