Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.misc > #26408

Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search
Date Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:02:54 +0000
Organization Frantic
Message-ID <86bjvsynpd.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References <678ebba8@news.ausics.net> <lv9hl5FtnivU1@mid.individual.net> <87y0z45m1l.fsf@example.com> <67900a10@news.ausics.net> <9H4-xv0RRHnQ3Eof@violet.siamics.net> <lvgmr9F3t5qU1@mid.individual.net> <86frl4yo0g.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info solani.org; logging-data="616764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:A/eV/Qe6EKOmngkr8xEk2Cq5McY= sha1:pjUp2QZsicm0KN0IC7i7aoedQiE=
X-User-ID eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLywi0yOH1L6F3KgarQ1Ojri7HwwWDOhP8IdLh7f4RY54keHUj9WZl5z4XLBFk
Xref csiph.com comp.misc:26408

Show key headers only | View raw


Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> writes:

> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 24-Jan-25 3:33 am, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-21, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>>> Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> writes:
>>>   >>> How is this going to '"better protect" Google Search against
>>>   >>> malicious activity, such as bots and spam'?
>>>   >> I believe the idea is that if the robot doesn't speak
>>> Javascript,
>>>   >> it's an easy denial by the web server.  And making bots speak
>>>   >> Javascript is one step up.  And with Javascript they can likely
>>>   >> monitor things like mouse movement to detect whether the user
>>>   >> is a human or a robot.
>>>   > Which of course is one of Google's main businesses, with their
>>>   > Captchas that don't always need to show a puzzle in order to
>>>   > validate users as humans.  So if anyone _thinks_ they can achieve
>>>   > that, you'd expect it to be Google.
>>> 	And they don't even need it to be perfect: a robot that
>>> 	implements the relevant browser APIs, while possible, /will/
>>> 	be costlier to run and maintain, thus reducing the profits of
>>> 	the robot operators, in turn disincentivizing them.
>>> 	Even if that doesn't solve the problem altogether, it will
>>> 	still likely result in less load for their servers.
>>> 	Not that it invalidates any other reasons they might want to
>>> 	require Javascript / APIs regardless, mind you.
>>
>> A bot only needs to be able to send the correct data to the
>> server. how difficult that is obviously depends on the details of the
>> Javascript's interactions with the server, but frequent interactions
>> themselves create a higher server load.
>>
>> One example would be the mouse-movement based human detection. If the
>> script just sends a yes/no message to the server, then the bot doesn't
>> need to try to emulate a human at all.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> That's useful. I set my Seamonkey user agent string to a Lynx user agent
> string and now google search works without javascript.

Sorry, I replied to the wrong article.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

[LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-21 07:10 +1000
  Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:23 +0100
  Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-21 20:18 +0800
    Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Jan van den Broek <balglaas@dds.nl> - 2025-01-21 12:56 +0000
      Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 19:18 +0100
    Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-01-21 10:33 -0300
      Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-21 18:12 +0000
      Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-22 06:56 +1000
        Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-01-23 19:33 +0000
          Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-24 13:30 +0800
            Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-01-27 20:56 +0000
              Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-01-27 21:02 +0000
      Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-01-29 19:00 +0000
        Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-29 19:33 +0000
          Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-01-29 20:04 +0000
            Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-01-29 22:15 +0000
              Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:50 +0100
              Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-01-30 18:47 +0000
            Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 00:53 +0000
              Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-01-30 01:53 +0042
                Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 03:38 +0000
                Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-01-30 04:43 +0042
        Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-24 05:38 +0000
  Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2025-01-21 15:30 +0000
    Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search D <noreply@mixmin.net> - 2025-01-21 16:26 +0000
    Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 19:21 +0100
  Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-21 19:54 +0000
    Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-22 06:47 +1000
      Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-01-21 22:49 +0042
        Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-22 13:04 +1000
          Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-01-22 12:58 +0042
          Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-01-25 15:15 +0000
  Re: [LINK] Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2025-01-21 20:57 +0000

csiph-web