Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.misc > #292
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Mattheiss <please.post@publicly.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc |
| Subject | Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? |
| Date | Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:11:38 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2012.10.11.20.11.38.305072@publicly.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <eb187c71d0ac001701e1fd16cfef6f1c@breaka.net> |
| Reply-To | lvzwlcykh5uctsy5.t.hadvabvobs@antichef.net |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c9e145c40485359f5465f190048647df"; logging-data="32709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18aG+o9Fn1HfAxVmoPtaaN0iiHmJrIX1hw=" |
| X-No-Archive | yes |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7KgBTl7Zow0HxH5tTeCTPnlK9HE= sha1:AU+5+Mys4eqaRlYK24Wp1zrvoII= |
| X-PGP-Key | 0x572D18F7 |
| X-PGP-Hash | SHA1 |
| X-PGP-Sig | GnuPG-v1.4.12-svn5488 From,Newsgroups,Subject,Date,Message-ID,Reply-To iJwEAQECAAYFAlB3KIEACgkQyu231lctGPdkXgP/YpoKILFaemP9X7JcFZ6hVxRE 6HZ4oQQa6pNhZj/KjYgpJ61Rt2FrI9kO6CUczNZay+07jYGfSLAMK9hDaVRC0Tqh ieMsVBFHYmwXk7JpoKfV8Fx/7YhkINzEe+HXLx3qXACVw27Ga52qqQ4VQomHO1Z8 vFyfwpulYUEN1g27CXM= =Lk9U |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.mail.misc:292 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi, you are aware that outlook supports S/MIME natively? S/MIME is effectively the same as gpg in that it *does* the same thing, but the nomenclature and in particular the "trust model" (important for signing messages) follows different approaches. It is also a bit more difficult to get a private/public key than in gpg. Plus, the handling in Windows is something one needs getting used to. The reason why I am not all that happy with outlook's implementation of S/MIME is because it's doing it's own thing when signing messages. Basically it renders such messages unreadable for an adressee not using outlook as well. Regards Andreas
Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <noreply@breaka.net> - 2012-10-09 03:55 -0600
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-09 17:47 +0200
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-14 05:19 +0200
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-15 13:29 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-29 22:28 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-31 03:06 +0100
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Andreas Mattheiss <please.post@publicly.invalid> - 2012-10-11 22:11 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-12 19:24 -0400
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-10-13 15:55 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-13 13:00 -0400
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> - 2012-10-15 17:49 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-15 16:43 -0400
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? "Thor Kottelin" <thor@anta.net> - 2012-10-16 01:19 +0300
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-15 19:35 -0400
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? "Thor Kottelin" <thor@anta.net> - 2012-10-16 03:39 +0300
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> - 2012-10-16 13:35 +0200
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Andreas Mattheiss <please.post@publicly.invalid> - 2012-10-20 19:01 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-31 08:30 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-31 17:25 +0000
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <noreply@breaka.net> - 2012-11-01 05:25 -0600
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-11-01 14:05 +0000
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <noreply@breaka.net> - 2012-10-25 13:00 -0600
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-16 04:16 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-15 23:08 -0400
Re: Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <noreply@breaka.net> - 2012-10-23 10:39 -0600
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2012-10-30 23:03 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2012-11-02 07:59 -0500
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-20 19:53 +0000
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-20 16:43 -0400
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-21 09:30 +0200
Re: PGP tools for dumb users -- suggestions? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-21 08:49 -0400
csiph-web