Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3615
| From | Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Is everything object ? |
| Date | 2011-04-28 04:56 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <4DB939E8.4020401@ruby-lang.org> (permalink) |
| References | <62f261dc2ccebf22a5a04124a9b3bc7f@ruby-forum.com> |
(04/28/2011 06:48 PM), amir e. wrote: > Hi > A very important principle in Ruby is that every thing is object. > I read somewhere that there is no primitive operation in Ruby in > traditional form and every operation is class. > Now if every thing is object , then why + , - , * , ^ , ^^ isn't > class Although they are primitive operation ? > > ps : If you test these codes , error happen : +.class -.class *.class > “Or else it doesn't, you know. The name of the song is called ‘Haddocks' Eyes.’” “Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?" Alice said, trying to feel interested. “No, you don't understand,” the Knight said, looking a little vexed. “That's what the name is called. The name really is ‘The Aged Aged Man.’” “Then I ought to have said ‘That's what the song is called’?” Alice corrected herself. “No, you oughtn't: that's quite another thing! The song is called ‘Ways And Means’: but that's only what it's called, you know!” “Well, what is the song, then?” said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered. “I was coming to that,” the Knight said. “The song really is ‘A-sitting On A Gate’: and the tune's my own invention.”
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is everything object ? "amir e." <aef1370@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:48 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> - 2011-04-28 04:56 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:59 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 04:54 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 06:52 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 10:26 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Michael Sokol <mikaa123@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:49 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:39 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 23:09 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:01 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-28 15:22 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 15:36 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 11:54 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 18:50 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-28 14:43 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu> - 2011-04-28 23:37 -0500
csiph-web