Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3615

Re: Is everything object ?

From Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.ruby
Subject Re: Is everything object ?
Date 2011-04-28 04:56 -0500
Organization Service de news de lacave.net
Message-ID <4DB939E8.4020401@ruby-lang.org> (permalink)
References <62f261dc2ccebf22a5a04124a9b3bc7f@ruby-forum.com>

Show all headers | View raw


(04/28/2011 06:48 PM), amir e. wrote:
> Hi
> A very important principle in Ruby is that every thing is object.
> I read somewhere that there is no primitive operation in Ruby in
> traditional form and every operation is class.
> Now if every thing is object , then why   + , - , * , ^ , ^^   isn't
> class Although they are primitive operation ?
> 
> ps : If you test these codes , error happen : +.class  -.class   *.class
> 

“Or else it doesn't, you know. The name of the song is called ‘Haddocks' Eyes.’”

“Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?" Alice said, trying to feel interested.

“No, you don't understand,” the Knight said, looking a little vexed. “That's
what the name is called. The name really is ‘The Aged Aged Man.’”

“Then I ought to have said ‘That's what the song is called’?” Alice corrected
herself.

“No, you oughtn't: that's quite another thing! The song is called ‘Ways And
Means’: but that's only what it's called, you know!”

“Well, what is the song, then?” said Alice, who was by this time completely
bewildered.

“I was coming to that,” the Knight said. “The song really is ‘A-sitting On A
Gate’: and the tune's my own invention.”

Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is everything object ? "amir e." <aef1370@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:48 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> - 2011-04-28 04:56 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:59 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 04:54 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 06:52 -0500
    Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 10:26 -0500
      Re: Is everything object ? Michael Sokol <mikaa123@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:49 -0500
    Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0500
      Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:39 -0500
        Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 23:09 -0500
          Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:01 -0500
    Re: Is everything object ? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-28 15:22 -0500
      Re: Is everything object ? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 15:36 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 11:54 -0500
    Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 18:50 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-28 14:43 -0500
  Re: Is everything object ? Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu> - 2011-04-28 23:37 -0500

csiph-web