Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3679
| From | Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Is everything object ? |
| Date | 2011-04-28 23:37 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <4DBA4062.70101@ucla.edu> (permalink) |
| References | <62f261dc2ccebf22a5a04124a9b3bc7f@ruby-forum.com> |
On 04/28/2011 02:48 AM, amir e. wrote: > Hi > A very important principle in Ruby is that every thing is object. > I read somewhere that there is no primitive operation in Ruby in > traditional form and every operation is class. > Now if every thing is object , then why + , - , * , ^ , ^^ isn't > class Although they are primitive operation ? > > ps : If you test these codes , error happen : +.class -.class *.class Actually, "everything is an object" is probably a mantra Rubyists should drop, because people will get confused when they find they can't call methods on every piece of Ruby code. I would say all values in Ruby are objects and all expressions return a value. But there are (admittedly few) things which are not expressions. The best thing is to not worry too much about absolutes and just enjoy exploring. -Justin
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is everything object ? "amir e." <aef1370@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:48 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> - 2011-04-28 04:56 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:59 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 04:54 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 06:52 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Roger Braun <roger@rogerbraun.net> - 2011-04-28 10:26 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Michael Sokol <mikaa123@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:49 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:39 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 23:09 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:01 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-28 15:22 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-28 15:36 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 11:54 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-28 18:50 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-28 14:43 -0500
Re: Is everything object ? Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu> - 2011-04-28 23:37 -0500
csiph-web