Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail From: Urabe Shyouhei Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: Is everything object ? Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:56:59 -0500 Organization: Service de news de lacave.net Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4DB939E8.4020401@ruby-lang.org> References: <62f261dc2ccebf22a5a04124a9b3bc7f@ruby-forum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bristol.highgroove.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: talisker.lacave.net 1303984633 2541 65.111.164.187 (28 Apr 2011 09:57:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@lacave.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:57:13 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <62f261dc2ccebf22a5a04124a9b3bc7f@ruby-forum.com> X-Received-From: This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway X-Mail-Count: 382294 X-Ml-Name: ruby-talk X-Rubymirror: Yes X-Ruby-Talk: <4DB939E8.4020401@ruby-lang.org> Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:3615 (04/28/2011 06:48 PM), amir e. wrote: > Hi > A very important principle in Ruby is that every thing is object. > I read somewhere that there is no primitive operation in Ruby in > traditional form and every operation is class. > Now if every thing is object , then why + , - , * , ^ , ^^ isn't > class Although they are primitive operation ? > > ps : If you test these codes , error happen : +.class -.class *.class > “Or else it doesn't, you know. The name of the song is called ‘Haddocks' Eyes.’” “Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?" Alice said, trying to feel interested. “No, you don't understand,” the Knight said, looking a little vexed. “That's what the name is called. The name really is ‘The Aged Aged Man.’” “Then I ought to have said ‘That's what the song is called’?” Alice corrected herself. “No, you oughtn't: that's quite another thing! The song is called ‘Ways And Means’: but that's only what it's called, you know!” “Well, what is the song, then?” said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered. “I was coming to that,” the Knight said. “The song really is ‘A-sitting On A Gate’: and the tune's my own invention.”