Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49434 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-06-29 18:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2013-07-03 00:22 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 122 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-29 18:00 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-06-30 20:24 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 20:58 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-06-30 23:14 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 21:36 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 08:23 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 10:52 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 10:54 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 12:05 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 11:32 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 12:37 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 14:28 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 16:22 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 12:44 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 10:31 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 12:46 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 14:44 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 11:07 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 12:43 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 15:08 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 15:33 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 21:18 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 23:14 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 20:32 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 09:25 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 16:28 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 08:45 -0500
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 15:34 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 08:49 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 17:56 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 20:15 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 18:26 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 11:29 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 20:16 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 12:29 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 21:12 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 20:28 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 09:22 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 10:34 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 14:01 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 14:40 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 06:48 -0700
OT Plague [was Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 02:37 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-03 08:34 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-02 17:30 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 01:24 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 10:08 -0700
Whatever happened to the Effbot? [was Re: python adds an etc] alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 11:16 +1000
Re: Whatever happened to the Effbot? [was Re: python adds an etc] Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-07-03 20:31 -0500
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-03 11:21 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 10:11 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-04 14:09 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-05 15:40 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-08 10:19 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 19:45 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 13:00 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list feedthetroll@gmx.de - 2013-07-03 07:12 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 16:21 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 10:00 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list feedthetroll@gmx.de - 2013-07-04 01:24 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 10:01 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 11:08 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 18:29 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 12:18 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-04 03:08 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-04 10:53 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 02:08 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 20:07 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 22:44 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-04 08:57 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list feedthetroll@gmx.de - 2013-07-04 01:50 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-05 15:42 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:44 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 18:36 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 01:44 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 19:47 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 02:53 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 20:07 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 03:23 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 20:50 +0300
Fwd: Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-04 13:06 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 17:42 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-03 20:10 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 05:31 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:37 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-03 12:04 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 00:18 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-02 18:21 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:12 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 18:56 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:40 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-04 13:19 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 02:58 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-03 10:36 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 01:51 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-03 12:01 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 19:27 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 19:36 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 22:57 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 23:13 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 08:37 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 10:55 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 10:56 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-07-01 14:01 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 08:00 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-07-01 15:06 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 21:34 -0700
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 06:32 +0100
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-02 07:14 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-07-02 18:59 -0400
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-07-02 19:06 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-01 19:33 +0300
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-01 20:42 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 22:12 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 09:55 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 17:59 +1000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 23:17 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 08:54 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 01:43 -0600
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-07-02 10:16 +0200
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 12:53 +0000
Re: python adds an extra half space when reading from a string or list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 00:22 +0000
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-04 13:06 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kr3het$jn0$2@news.grnet.gr> |
| In reply to | #49767 |
Στις 3/7/2013 8:23 μμ, ο/η Chris Angelico έγραψε: >>> What are the file permissions (file modes) on all your home >>> directories? Do you know what they mean? >> >> >> root@nikos [~]# ls -al /home >> total 88 >> drwx--x--x 22 root root 4096 Jul 3 20:03 ./ >> drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Jun 12 01:21 ../ >> drwx--x--x 14 akis akis 4096 Apr 5 22:21 akis/ >> same with others just +x for group and others. >> >> Does that mean you can easily i.e. 'cd /home/akis/' accessing their home >> directories? > > Yes. You can cd to the other users home directories but you wont be able to view their files because of the lack of +r attribute. But i'll remove it just in case by: chmod go-x -R /home/whatever_username >> Yes they do, but cPanel offers some protection against these kind of methods >> called "CPHulk" so it wont be easy! > > Neat. Now I know how to lock you out of your own account. Five seconds > with Google brought this up: > > http://docs.cpanel.net/twiki/bin/view/11_30/WHMDocs/CPHulk > > Can you, by reading that page, tell me what I would have to do to stop > you from accessing your login? yes constantly ping my server by faking you ip address as my ip address so to force CPHulk to refuse to let me login. Of course the same page provides a means of how to unlock myself in case that happens. > Also, CPHulk does not appear to have _any_ protection against > privilege escalation. It's a completely different thing. Yes, it does not. Its mostly a way to block nmap requests of pinging and identifying of services running on the server itself. -- What is now proved was at first only imagined!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 17:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4181.1372871267.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49749 |
On 03/07/2013 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> wrote: >> I will *not* give away my root pass to anyone for any reason but i will open >> a norla user account for someone if i feel like trusting him and copy my >> python file to his homr dir to take alook from within. > Well... well... baby steps. That's something at least. That's still a > huge level of access, though; with a non-root account on your server, > I would be able to - I think - read all your customers' code. You > would have to chroot the user you give, and if you're going to do > that, you may as well just give the code as a .py file. Really, you > need to have a MUCH stronger respect for shell access, even non-root. > > ChrisA Nicos A hard lesson learnt, I think. I have read most of the responses to your posts but kept my contributions to a minimum. Here's my advice to you: 1. Don't trust ANYBODY on the internet unless you have thought carefully about what you are being offered. 2. Do seriously consider following advice from this list, especially the advice to read external references and documents - obviously subject to point 1 :-) 3. Don't EVER compromise security for some real or imagined deadline - your customers will probably grumble if you are late but they will likely sue you if you compromise their data. They'll definitely sue if you compromise their money in any way. Chris taught you a valuable lesson - hard but valuable. 4. Take a few hours out and re-read your recent threads. Pick out the constructive advice you have ignored and follow up on it. It may take days or even weeks to get your head around it but IMHO there is huge value to be gained from the exercise. You have taken some big strides over the past several weeks, supported by some *very* patient experts, but it is clear you still have plenty to learn - pause, read, digest, reflect and then move forward. Take care Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 20:10 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kr1luh$ta4$4@news.grnet.gr> |
| In reply to | #49760 |
Στις 3/7/2013 7:42 μμ, ο/η Steve Simmons έγραψε: > > On 03/07/2013 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM, ����� <nikos@superhost.gr> wrote: >>> I will *not* give away my root pass to anyone for any reason but i >>> will open >>> a norla user account for someone if i feel like trusting him and copy my >>> python file to his homr dir to take alook from within. >> Well... well... baby steps. That's something at least. That's still a >> huge level of access, though; with a non-root account on your server, >> I would be able to - I think - read all your customers' code. You >> would have to chroot the user you give, and if you're going to do >> that, you may as well just give the code as a .py file. Really, you >> need to have a MUCH stronger respect for shell access, even non-root. >> >> ChrisA > > Nicos > > A hard lesson learnt, I think. I have read most of the responses to > your posts but kept my contributions to a minimum. Here's my advice to > you: > > 1. Don't trust ANYBODY on the internet unless you have thought > carefully about what you are being offered. > 2. Do seriously consider following advice from this list, especially > the advice to read external references and documents - obviously subject > to point 1 :-) > 3. Don't EVER compromise security for some real or imagined deadline - > your customers will probably grumble if you are late but they will > likely sue you if you compromise their data. They'll definitely sue if > you compromise their money in any way. Chris taught you a valuable > lesson - hard but valuable. > 4. Take a few hours out and re-read your recent threads. Pick out the > constructive advice you have ignored and follow up on it. It may take > days or even weeks to get your head around it but IMHO there is huge > value to be gained from the exercise. > > You have taken some big strides over the past several weeks, supported > by some *very* patient experts, but it is clear you still have plenty to > learn - pause, read, digest, reflect and then move forward. > > Take care > > Steve Thanks Steven, i keep learning new thing every day that passes by. -- What is now proved was at first only imagined!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 05:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <01597ae1-cad3-4ed0-85ca-857b7eb2f3df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49714 |
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 3:15:15 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > If my boss gave a random stranger from a mailing list the root > password to one of our servers, I would say to his face that he had > betrayed his (our) customers' trust. I would say it with strong > emphasis and a raised tone, too, and no small heat. The words you > quote above are perfectly factual and, in my opinion, business-like > language. I am guessing Chris (do correct me if wrong) that you are making a theoretical/hypothetical statement. I guess your boss is not an asshole in matters of things like passwords so you are making a vacuous statement. [For those not familiar with the terminology: "A implies B is vacuously true, if A is 'grounded' to false. Then B can be anything wild] Speaking as one who has had to change jobs because of impossible bosses...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-04 00:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4172.1372862580.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49722 |
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: >> If my boss gave a random stranger from a mailing list the root >> password to one of our servers, I would say to his face that he had >> betrayed his (our) customers' trust. I would say it with strong >> emphasis and a raised tone, too, and no small heat. The words you >> quote above are perfectly factual and, in my opinion, business-like >> language. >> >> ChrisA > > But the real question of course is, would your boss see it that way? > Maybe your boss would, but talking about a random boss, I wouldn't > bet any money on it. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote: > I am guessing Chris (do correct me if wrong) that you are making a theoretical/hypothetical statement. I guess your boss is not an asshole in matters of things like passwords so you are making a vacuous statement. > > [For those not familiar with the terminology: "A implies B is vacuously true, if A is 'grounded' to false. Then B can be anything wild] > > Speaking as one who has had to change jobs because of impossible bosses... Speaking about my current boss, rusi's right that the situation will never come up. He errs on the side of paranoia, not sloppiness. (And before I criticize him for the paranoia, I remind myself of this[1] PHDComics strip.) But if I had a boss who actually did that, then I would say my piece, and then my continued employment would depend on how he took it. If he accepts the criticism and moves on, then we look to damage control; if not, then I look to getting a new job. I don't think I would ever mind get fired for making that sort of statement - if it gets me fired, I'm probably happier out of there anyway. ChrisA [1] http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=640 - start at http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=638 for context
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 12:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4159.1372845878.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49678 |
Op 03-07-13 11:45, Chris Angelico schreef: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Antoon Pardon > <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: >> Op 03-07-13 02:30, rurpy@yahoo.com schreef: >>> If your going to point out something negative about someone >>> then do so politely. Ask yourself if you were pointing out >>> incompetence to your boss (or anyone else where impoliteness >>> could have real consequences for you) if you would say, >>> "you're incompetent." >> And so we shift from no problem speaking bluntly or clearly >> to wording it in a way that wouldn't antagonize your boss >> too much. >> >> Off course that would also mean throwing out remarks like: >> >> ] You have betrayed the trust of all your customers. >> >> Which seemed to be accepted on this list without a problem. > If my boss gave a random stranger from a mailing list the root > password to one of our servers, I would say to his face that he had > betrayed his (our) customers' trust. I would say it with strong > emphasis and a raised tone, too, and no small heat. The words you > quote above are perfectly factual and, in my opinion, business-like > language. > > ChrisA But the real question of course is, would your boss see it that way? Maybe your boss would, but talking about a random boss, I wouldn't bet any money on it. -- Antoon Pardon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 00:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4136.1372807156.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49569 |
On 2 July 2013 23:34, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> writes: >> There is not ever a place on this list where you will need to call >> someone incompetent. > > So even if that term describes their behaviour and manner, you think > no-one should ever point it out? Yes. I see no instance where it would be needed or helpful. >> > So what are the non-insulting terms for >> > >> > incompentent, (starting a webservice in a language you're a newby in, >> > making changes on the life server so that any typo you make, can take >> > your site out the air), >> >> You just did it. > > So you agree the correct term to use *is* “incompetent”, as Anton said. > Yet you don't want Anton to use the correct term. What? No, I think you misread what I intended in that post. I said that rather than attacking Niko's integrity by calling him incompetent, it is better to, for example, explain to him that he is "starting a webservice in a language you're a newby in, making changes on the life server so that any typo you make, can take your site out the air". Given, of course, that that is what prompted you to want to call him incompetent in the first place. Saying "you don't understand what you are doing" and "you are incompetent" are in this case interchangeable, except one involves making the other feel hurt. You don't need to do that, nor does it help anyone. > Needless to say, I disagree with your position. There is no place for > baseless insults in this community; but when the behaviour of someone in > this community is harmful, then it is entirely appropriate to use clear > terms (e.g. “incompetent”, “inconsiderate”) to describe their behaviour. Firstly, describing someone's behaviour and describing someone's character are two completely different things. The second is far more judgemental and unhelpful than the first. Antoon is describing people's character. You are talking about describing their actions. Secondly, as I said, I have few objections to the term "inconsiderate". Fewer still when describing a behaviour. As for calling someone incompetent, it would be wrong to associate incompetence with harm to this community. People were not upset -- at least I was not upset -- from Nikos being incompetent. Many people on this list lack skills. This is fine, everyone's unlearnt at some point. Some stay unlearnt forever. People were upset because of his manner, his demanding, his overbearing, him acting selfishly, etc. I will never complain to you calling someone rude, especially not calling someone's actions rude. I will never complain to you calling someone overbearing, especially not calling someone's actions overbearing. I will never complain to you calling someone's actions selfish. etc. I may disagree, and I may voice disagreements, but you have right to speak up if you feel mistreated. Please don't believe I think otherwise. Calling someone incompetent is an attack, and is not the same. If you cannot see the difference, I'm not sure what more I can say. I feel it is reasonable to continue my correspondence with you on-list, but if it spawns more than a few more posts I would rather take it off-list. I have no objections if you would like to Cc Antoon Pardon in the process, seeing as it's his post involved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rurpy@yahoo.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-02 18:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <72d35bd5-7048-4b8a-8a50-229a54703f05@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49667 |
On 07/02/2013 05:18 PM, Joshua Landau wrote: > On 2 July 2013 23:34, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: >[...] >> Needless to say, I disagree with your position. There is no place for >> baseless insults in this community; but when the behaviour of someone in >> this community is harmful, then it is entirely appropriate to use clear >> terms (e.g. “incompetent”, “inconsiderate”) to describe their behaviour. > > Firstly, describing someone's behaviour and describing someone's > character are two completely different things. The second is far more > judgemental and unhelpful than the first. Antoon is describing > people's character. You are talking about describing their actions. In practice there is often little difference. "You are acting like an asshole" could be defended as describing a behavior and "you are rude" as describing a character (rude by nature). The reality is that few of the people at whom such statements are aimed will make such fine distinction. If you use negatively judgemental statements against other posters, a significant number of them will respond to you in kind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-04 00:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4190.1372893192.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49689 |
On 3 July 2013 02:21, <rurpy@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 07/02/2013 05:18 PM, Joshua Landau wrote: >> On 2 July 2013 23:34, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: >>[...] >>> Needless to say, I disagree with your position. There is no place for >>> baseless insults in this community; but when the behaviour of someone in >>> this community is harmful, then it is entirely appropriate to use clear >>> terms (e.g. “incompetent”, “inconsiderate”) to describe their behaviour. >> >> Firstly, describing someone's behaviour and describing someone's >> character are two completely different things. The second is far more >> judgemental and unhelpful than the first. Antoon is describing >> people's character. You are talking about describing their actions. > > In practice there is often little difference. "You are acting > like an asshole" could be defended as describing a behavior > and "you are rude" as describing a character (rude by nature). "You are acting like an asshole" *is* describing someone's behaviour. "You are an asshole" is the equivalent describing their character. In turn, "You are rude" *is* describing their character. However, I said the "second is far more judgemental and unhelpful than the first". I stand by that, but don't take that to mean that comments on people's behaviour cannot be insulting of derogatory, nor that comments on character have to be insulting. Calling someone rude may be worse than saying that they are acting rude, but it is not unjust if they have been rude, for example. > The reality is that few of the people at whom such statements > are aimed will make such fine distinction. If you use negatively > judgemental statements against other posters, a significant > number of them will respond to you in kind. I think most people will take "you are stupid" and "what you've done is stupid" to have very different levels of hostility, even though the same thing to be said has been expressed. That does not mean people will not take offense at the second, but they will take less. I believe that this does generalise. Note that I am not advocating calling people's actions stupid, as it is still just a harsher way of saying "you've made a mistake".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rurpy@yahoo.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eba80774-331b-4bd2-9639-971dfd228242@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49785 |
On 07/03/2013 05:12 PM, Joshua Landau wrote: > On 3 July 2013 02:21, <rurpy@yahoo.com> wrote: >[...] >> The reality is that few of the people at whom such statements >> are aimed will make such fine distinction. If you use negatively >> judgemental statements against other posters, a significant >> number of them will respond to you in kind. > > I think most people will take "you are stupid" and "what you've done > is stupid" to have very different levels of hostility, even though the > same thing to be said has been expressed. That does not mean people > will not take offense at the second, but they will take less. I > believe that this does generalise. I think the first is perceived as more hostile not because of any character vs behavior difference but simply because it is broader -- the implication is that most anything done by the person will be stupid rather than one specific action for the second. If one compares "you're stupid to have done that" (character) vs "what you've done is stupid" (behavior), I am not sure there is much difference; at least I don't think I'd make much distinction. IOW, I maintain that it is the "stupid" part that results in the major part of the recipient's negative reaction. Of course since neither of us are psychologists this is all pretty speculative. > Note that I am not advocating calling people's actions stupid, as it > is still just a harsher way of saying "you've made a mistake". Agreed, 100%.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-04 00:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4192.1372894857.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49689 |
On 3 July 2013 11:01, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > Op 02-07-13 15:40, Joshua Landau schreef: >> On 2 July 2013 13:01, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: >>> >> >> There is not ever a place on this list where you will need to call >> someone incompetent. You can explain to someone that they do not >> understand what they are doing, but when you attack the character of >> the person it is no longer acceptable. > > This is not an attack of character. Level of skill/competence is > not in general seen as a character trait. I disagree. I'm not sure how to argue this, rather than point out that by "character trait" I'm not talking about "intrinsic trait" but rather "revolving around who you are". The alternative I posed is talking about things revolving around specific actions that you have taken. > It is something one can > generally increase if one is willing to work on it, and once > you acquired it, you don't have to keep your guard for situations > in which you might loose it. That's not relevant to whether it's a character trait, á mon avis. >>> So what are the non-insulting terms for >>> >>> incompentent, (starting a webservice in a language you're a newby in, >>> making changes on the life server so that any typo you make, can take >>> your site out the air), >> You just did it. > > But how do I describe this in one word? What conclusion am I allowed > to make from all this? That it's worth taking a little more time doing things if it makes sure you aren't harming the person on the other end. > Can I say: > He displayed a pattern of incompetence? WIth trepidation. Saying what someone did is "incompetent" is quite judgemental. > He has been blundering about? With trepidation. This is just another way of saying the same thing. > His skill level was unimpressive? With trepidation. This refers to his character, but is still quite light and far lower than the level of aggression that spawned my speaking-up. > The skill level he displayed, left much to be desired? Probably. Except only if you remove the comma. Bear in mind that if the way you were acting was all in my "with trepidation" category, I would likely have not spoken up. I believe you crossed a lot further beyond that line. >>> inconsiderate (behave annoyingly in multiple ways and despite poeple pointing >>> it out multiple times, mostly continue in the same manner, without taking >>> their remarks into account) and >> I do not tend to consider "inconsiderate" inappropriate if said in >> earnest, as it is defensive. I'd still rather you talked about actions >> as inconsiderate rather than people, but baby steps. > > I don't understand this, since (in)consideration is in general seen as > a character trait. On that basis I think you have it exactly backwards > when you consider "incompetent" an attack of character yet seem to > have little problem with "inconsiderate". "You are inconsiderate" is describing someone's character. Hence I believe it would be better to say "what you did was inconsiderate". What I was saying, though, is that because "inconsiderate" is defensive and reactionary it is not an insult*. It refers to the fact that you believe the person you say it to should respect other people and what he is doing negatively impacts them. Another example would be: "you are awesome". Despite being a description of character, I'm not too idiotic to realise that it is not a mean thing to say. (Even here, "what you did is awesome" is a *milder* way of saying the same idea.) It's easy to misread what I've said, but I was never trying to imply that my problem was solely in this distinction -- it was just that it's important to realise that the divide exists and very explanatory to some aspects of how people take commentary. Both rurpy and you seem to have mistaken me to believe that describing character vs. describing actions is the be-all and end-all. Rather, I just believe it is a large factor in the harshness of what you say. *You seem to have moved back to the term "insult"; this seems especially appropriate since we are discussing its meaning. > Yet people who have a more > inconsiderate character can't work on acquiring consideration, as one > can on acquiring skill/competence. Sure one can work on it, but it is > something you have to keep watchful for. Otherwise you can easily slip > again into a pattern of being/behaving inconsiderate. Firstly, I disagree. Consideration is a learnt trait as most human interaction is. Secondly, I don't understand why you are bringing this up. >>> jerk (trying to spin your inconsiderate behaviour as you being the victim, >>> misrepresenting your behaviour when it is being discussed, always "explaining" >>> your behaviour, as if an explanation would make a difference to the annoyance >>> you caused to others...) >> You came close. > > Same question as two entries above. I shall leave this open to see if you think my answer above applies here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-04 13:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4220.1372936774.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49689 |
Op 04-07-13 01:40, Joshua Landau schreef: > On 3 July 2013 11:01, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > >> This is not an attack of character. Level of skill/competence is >> not in general seen as a character trait. > I disagree. I'm not sure how to argue this, rather than point out that > by "character trait" I'm not talking about "intrinsic trait" but > rather "revolving around who you are". The alternative I posed is > talking about things revolving around specific actions that you have > taken. All right I can work with that. However I get the impression what you are talking about is then not limited to character traits but can be applied to other traits too. It is unlikely to come up in this group but I guess you would be opposed in a similar way to someone being called a weakling after it became clear he was not physically fit for a particular task. >> But how do I describe this in one word? What conclusion am I allowed >> to make from all this? > That it's worth taking a little more time doing things if it makes > sure you aren't harming the person on the other end. I agree to a certain extend. But sometimes I seem to come up (not only on usenet but in real life too) to people who seem to be oblivious to the message you are sending until you cast it into words that sting. I have been guily of such behaviour myself, not really reacting to the warnings from my partner until they were termed in a way that was hard to ignore. And sure, there is a serious risk of a hostile reaction, but getting a hostile reaction doesn't contradict that it was effective. People often do change their behaviour even if there first reaction was hostile and denial. So I'll agree to doing as little harm as possible and that there is a level of harm that shouldn't be crossed. But I won't go as far as making sure no harm is done. > >> [examples] > Bear in mind that if the way you were acting was all in my "with > trepidation" category, I would likely have not spoken up. I believe > you crossed a lot further beyond that line. I had to look up "trepidation" and the translation I got from my dictionary was not 100% helpful. Would "hesitation" or "wariness" be a good substitute. Can we go back to my first entry in this thread? I would like to know whether you think that already crossed the line or if that would fall under your "with trepidation" category and I crossed the line later. I think the relevant part is this: ] Maybe that way he'll learn that if he doesn't want to be considered ] an incompetent inconsiderate jerk, he shouldn't behave like one. -- Antoon Pardon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-05 02:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4263.1372989549.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49689 |
On 4 July 2013 12:19, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > Op 04-07-13 01:40, Joshua Landau schreef: > >> Bear in mind that if the way you were acting was all in my "with >> trepidation" category, I would likely have not spoken up. I believe >> you crossed a lot further beyond that line. > > I had to look up "trepidation" and the translation I got from my > dictionary was not 100% helpful. Would "hesitation" or "wariness" > be a good substitute. Yes; it's along the lines of "hesitation /due/ to wariness". > Can we go back to my first entry in this thread? I would like to > know whether you think that already crossed the line or if that > would fall under your "with trepidation" category and I crossed > the line later. > > I think the relevant part is this: > > ] Maybe that way he'll learn that if he doesn't want to be considered > ] an incompetent inconsiderate jerk, he shouldn't behave like one. If my records are accurate*, by the time I responded (excluding that to Mark Lawrence), you had also said: > Should we particularly care about Nikos's feelings? > May that way he'll learn that if he doesn't > want to be considered an incompetent inconsiderate jerk, he shouldn't > behave like one. > You'll notice I don't judge all newbies as > incompetent jerks. Just you > I am judging you for > behaving liken an asshole and trying to deny it. > you were behaving like an asshole > You poor thing. (Obvious hostile sarcasm in context) And quite a few repeats of the same things. * I thought I stepped in earlier, but I'm not going to argue with GMail's history. This quote: > Maybe that way he'll learn that if he doesn't want to be considered > an incompetent inconsiderate jerk, he shouldn't behave like one. in solidarity -- although calling someone "incompetent" and, especially, a "jerk" is unwanted -- would probably not have made me respond. However, it is definitely past the "with trepidation" category.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 10:36 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4141.1372811798.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49569 |
Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> writes: > Firstly, describing someone's behaviour and describing someone's > character are two completely different things. I agree with that. > Antoon is describing people's character. I disagree with that. To merely describe someone as “incompetent” is not to describe their behaviour: they are not competent to do what they are attempting, which is not a judgement on their character. Just as to merely describe someone as “ignorant” is to describe their lack of knowledge in some area, and is not a judgement on their character. Even character judgements can be appropriate, so long as they are salient to the acceptable behaviours in this forum; there are many character attributes that are incompatible with this community. So since both accurate description of actions and character judgement can be appropriate for discussing acceptable behaviour here, I'll thank you not to make absolute prohibitions against either. > You are talking about describing their actions. Yes. Since you seem to be imputing character judgements to descriptions which are accurate descriptions of behaviour, I think we've found the root of the disagreement. I've made my position clear and will let it rest there. > Calling someone incompetent is an attack It can be part of an attack, but in itself is merely a description of someone's behaviour. > If you cannot see the difference, I'm not sure what more I can say. Likewise. Thanks for caring enough about this community to act in the interest of keeping it open, considerate, and respectful. -- \ “Beware of and eschew pompous prolixity.” —Charles A. Beardsley | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 01:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4143.1372812761.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49569 |
On 3 July 2013 01:36, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > I think we've found the root of > the disagreement. I've made my position clear and will let it rest there. Seconded. > Thanks for caring enough about this community to act in the > interest of keeping it open, considerate, and respectful. Thank you in turn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 12:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4158.1372845705.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49569 |
Op 02-07-13 15:40, Joshua Landau schreef: > On 2 July 2013 13:01, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: >> Op 02-07-13 11:34, Joshua Landau schreef: >> >>> No it does not. I'd give you more of a counter but I actually have no >>> idea how you came up with that. >> Please answer the following question. If someone behaved incompetently, >> how can I clearly state that fact when "incompetently" is seen as an >> insult and insults don't belong on the list? > There is not ever a place on this list where you will need to call > someone incompetent. You can explain to someone that they do not > understand what they are doing, but when you attack the character of > the person it is no longer acceptable. This is not an attack of character. Level of skill/competence is not in general seen as a character trait. It is something one can generally increase if one is willing to work on it, and once you acquired it, you don't have to keep your guard for situations in which you might loose it. >>>> But for your ease of mind I'll make it clear I have no intention >>>> of haunting Nikos or of keeping him the subject of discussion. >>>> But should I stumble on a conversation in which his past behaviour >>>> is framed as him being innocentltly asking questions, I will point >>>> of what bullshit that is. >>> Fair enough. If that's all you did in this thread, then I wouldn't care. >>> >>> But once again you seem to have missed the point that I and others >>> keep reiterating: pseudo-insults have no place on this list. >>> >>> >>> (If you need a reminder, pseudo-insults are just what other people >>> term "insults". You can change the name if you see fit.) >> So what are the non-insulting terms for >> >> incompentent, (starting a webservice in a language you're a newby in, >> making changes on the life server so that any typo you make, can take >> your site out the air), > You just did it. But how do I describe this in one word? What conclusion am I allowed to make from all this? Can I say: He displayed a pattern of incompetence? He has been blundering about? His skill level was unimpressive? The skill level he displayed, left much to be desired? >> inconsiderate (behave annoyingly in multiple ways and despite poeple pointing >> it out multiple times, mostly continue in the same manner, without taking >> their remarks into account) and > I do not tend to consider "inconsiderate" inappropriate if said in > earnest, as it is defensive. I'd still rather you talked about actions > as inconsiderate rather than people, but baby steps. I don't understand this, since (in)consideration is in general seen as a character trait. On that basis I think you have it exactly backwards when you consider "incompetent" an attack of character yet seem to have little problem with "inconsiderate". Yet people who have a more inconsiderate character can't work on acquiring consideration, as one can on acquiring skill/competence. Sure one can work on it, but it is something you have to keep watchful for. Otherwise you can easily slip again into a pattern of being/behaving inconsiderate. >> jerk (trying to spin your inconsiderate behaviour as you being the victim, >> misrepresenting your behaviour when it is being discussed, always "explaining" >> your behaviour, as if an explanation would make a difference to the annoyance >> you caused to others...) > You came close. Same question as two entries above. > > > But, since Nikos has thankfully ceased, I'm saying here that unless > you have good reasons otherwise I'd rather only continue this > off-list. If you reply on-list without justification I will likely not > reply. > Since others have in the mean time responded in this thread, I didn't think it a good idea, to have this part in private. -- Antoon Pardon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-01 19:27 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kqsalc$ppg$1@news.grnet.gr> |
| In reply to | #49568 |
Στις 1/7/2013 6:34 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε: >> And no, i do not want to piss off people like you, who have spend time >> helping me. > > Too late. I asked you to stop flaming on-list, and you didn't. I am now > kill-filing you for a month. Feel grateful that it is not permanent, and > take this time to reflect that you are running out of people willing to > help you. First i saw his post and replied as i did and then i saw your reply. -- What is now proved was at first only imagined!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-01 19:36 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kqsb67$dga$2@news.grnet.gr> |
| In reply to | #49568 |
Στις 1/7/2013 6:34 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε: >>> The above of course assumes that I have not kill-filed you for >>> continuing to be abusive on-list. >> So, Steven you want me to sit tight and read all the insults coming from >> this guy? >> >> If that happened to you, wouldn't you feel the need and urge to reply >> back and stand for yourself? > "Stand up for yourself" and "be abusive" are two different things. I told > you, I don't care what you do off-list, but if you continue flaming on- > list, I will kill-file you. I was name called directly, as "incompetent jerk", thats a straightforward insult, so i responded back to him in the same manner. I'm not saying it was a nice thing to do, but i just had enough. -- What is now proved was at first only imagined!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-30 22:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4045.1372629509.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49499 |
On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote: >> >> Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε: >> >>> Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to >>> roll out the red carpet? >> >> >> Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like you. > > > That is not acceptable behavior on this list. Please keep the gratuitous > insults offlist. As much as you are right, this argument was started by Mark. If you reprimand anyone (other threads being ignored) it should be him. Reacting only to Nick, even though what Nick said was undue, implies that you agree with Mark's actions. Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to have his feelings hurt when so many people pick on him -- whether they are justified or not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-30 23:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4046.1372630419.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49499 |
On 2013-06-30 22:57, Joshua Landau wrote: > On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote: >>> >>> Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε: >>> >>>> Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to >>>> roll out the red carpet? >>> >>> >>> Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like you. >> >> >> That is not acceptable behavior on this list. Please keep the gratuitous >> insults offlist. > > As much as you are right, this argument was started by Mark. If you > reprimand anyone (other threads being ignored) it should be him. > Reacting only to Nick, even though what Nick said was undue, implies > that you agree with Mark's actions. > > Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to > have his feelings hurt when so many people pick on him -- whether they > are justified or not. I hereby reprimand both Mark and Nikos. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web