Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #84643 > unrolled thread

Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?

Started byChris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>
First post2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
Last post2015-01-27 10:27 -0800
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
    Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2015-01-27 09:49 -0800
      Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0800

#84643 — Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?

FromChris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>
Date2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
SubjectRe: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
Message-ID<mailman.18171.1422364818.18130.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Jan 27, 2015 2:16 PM, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
>
> for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:

for x in seq:
    if some_predicate:
        do_something_to(x)

-- 
Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
Sent from my Galaxy S3.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#84657

FromRob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid>
Date2015-01-27 09:49 -0800
Message-ID<20150127094911.236b6e6d@rg.highlandtechnology.com>
In reply to#84643
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:20:10 +0100
Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 27, 2015 2:16 PM, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
> >
> > for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:
> 
> for x in seq:
>     if some_predicate:
>         do_something_to(x)
> 
> -- 
> Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
> Sent from my Galaxy S3.
> 
Or the somewhat less indenty

for x in seq:
    if not some_predicate: continue
    do_something_to(x)

-- 
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order.  See above to fix.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#84663

FromEmile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com>
Date2015-01-27 10:27 -0800
Message-ID<mailman.18183.1422383271.18130.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#84657
On 1/27/2015 9:49 AM, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> Or the somewhat less indenty
>
> for x in seq:
>      if not some_predicate: continue
>      do_something_to(x)
>


... or shorter and equally less indenty


for x in seq:
     if some_predicate: do_something_to(x)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web