Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?

From	Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com>
Subject	Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
Date	2015-01-27 10:27 -0800
References	<ma8311$q4c$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.18171.1422364818.18130.python-list@python.org> <20150127094911.236b6e6d@rg.highlandtechnology.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.18183.1422383271.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/27/2015 9:49 AM, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> Or the somewhat less indenty
>
> for x in seq:
>      if not some_predicate: continue
>      do_something_to(x)
>


... or shorter and equally less indenty


for x in seq:
     if some_predicate: do_something_to(x)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
  Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2015-01-27 09:49 -0800
    Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0800

csiph-web