Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84643
| References | <ma8311$q4c$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-27 14:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? |
| From | Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18171.1422364818.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Jan 27, 2015 2:16 PM, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
>
> for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:
for x in seq:
if some_predicate:
do_something_to(x)
--
Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
Sent from my Galaxy S3.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2015-01-27 09:49 -0800
Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0800
csiph-web