Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #70398

Re: Why Python 3?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.albasani.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.033
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'float': 0.07; 'pep': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; '238': 0.16; 'arbitrarily': 0.16; 'floats;': 0.16; 'operation,': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'fraction': 0.24; 'mathematical': 0.24; 'math': 0.24; 'regardless': 0.24; 'values': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'decimal': 0.31; 'division': 0.31; 'something': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'acceptable': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'branch': 0.38; 'generic': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'use.': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'ian': 0.60; 'range': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'within': 0.65; '20,': 0.68; 'importantly,': 0.68; 'divide': 0.84; 'cast': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4TZBhyeng6JeqJgP8ODnSB4/jdGfR78P/mkhqrWPjQE=; b=V2wzXBLgiWg+9XTYllOVZet+eZzEC4mNxUhKutGhr4a/GI4QCZ/CVB0T0bwAN5z+Il bxvOusjRX6pBESRv98fCOis2hthBjNYz2pttoqCCLw09HaSY+s2GLG3rrkXm15w/9X93 yV9EKRbuDMikDyA2p46DpS73s3du290VWOhfY47aOaJ412Ptekqcn3KPM32Txsrquy5u TTLQZOLHU1M2sN32pafeNCbwvFj/aBEV+AKJuYzSeEcBl+Pj19arEIhXDMahqpZQfd99 AwfrdFEvlSf1USubE6uyIku1Lq0pjs1Dya3IGl8ZnSbXoS+0dKC6gx2HAebxG/e48uw7 soaA==
X-Received by 10.66.221.99 with SMTP id qd3mr29522228pac.46.1397939955292; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmrRm7hwb3pn8cj3_5qUKXj5urA2PK4raH2V_dtPWCacUg@mail.gmail.com>
References <mailman.9344.1397878113.18130.python-list@python.org> <7x8ur1esa5.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <CAPTjJmqAeuFnOmW890ykPkk4L7JpgYFtFpd6uk1xAXtt2MgBMw@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidmk9ogErqsF9ghM4_Bi=+n2qwCTpqJ48exOgg+L-2Gd_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmqcr+ZhtRRxGtOVX6ppLd=1RyQ2yU9X=fFy4zH8oLrHyA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzid=HrxL7kCwM5LOKEgwQT+YzrCH0xV57LXEjqU6jtsti=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrRm7hwb3pn8cj3_5qUKXj5urA2PK4raH2V_dtPWCacUg@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:38:35 -0600
Subject Re: Why Python 3?
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.9371.1397939964.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 25
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1397939964 news.xs4all.nl 2850 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34678
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:70398

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Considering that Fraction and Decimal did not exist yet, what type do
>> you think the PEP 238 implementers should have chosen for the result
>> of dividing two ints?  If float is not acceptable, and int is not
>> acceptable (which was the whole point of the PEP), then the only
>> alternative I can see would have been to raise a TypeError and force
>> the user to upcast explicitly.  In that case, dividing arbitrary ints
>> using floating-point math would not be possible for those ints that
>> are outside the range of floats; you would get OverflowError on the
>> upcast operation, regardless of whether the result of division would
>> be within the range of a float.
>>
>>> Yes, I can see that it's nice for simple interactive use.
>>
>> More importantly, it's useful for implementers of generic mathematical
>> routines.  If you're passed arbitrary inputs, you don't have to check
>> the types of the values you were given and then branch if both of the
>> values you were about to divide happened to be ints just because the
>> division operator arbitrarily does something different on ints.
>
> Or you just cast one of them to float. That way you're sure you're
> working with floats.

Which is inappropriate if the type passed in was a Decimal or a complex.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Python 3? Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2014-04-18 22:28 -0500
  Re: Why Python 3? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-18 23:40 -0700
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 17:34 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-04-19 09:26 -0400
        Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 23:42 +1000
        Re: Why Python 3? Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-19 10:57 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 10:07 +0000
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 03:25 -0600
      Re: Why Python 3? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-04-19 12:59 +0300
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 19:37 +1000
      Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 11:02 +0000
        Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2014-04-20 15:38 +0300
          Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 15:09 +0000
        Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:44 +1200
    Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-19 13:23 -0400
      Re: Why Python 3? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-19 20:25 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-04-20 19:15 +1000
        Re: Why Python 3? Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2014-04-20 23:50 +0000
          Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 10:00 +1000
            Re: Why Python 3? HoneyMonster <nobody@someplace.invalid> - 2014-04-21 04:08 +0000
          Re: Why Python 3? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-21 01:11 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-19 18:31 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 03:53 +1000
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 13:58 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:31 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-20 13:06 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 11:28 +1000
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 10:52 +1200
            Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 09:24 +1000
              Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-21 03:43 +0000
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 14:43 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 09:58 +1200
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 14:48 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 02:42 -0700
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 10:28 +1200
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 08:43 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 18:03 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 00:17 -0400
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:13 +1200
            Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 20:09 -0400
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 14:38 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:53 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-20 13:35 +1200
    Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 09:59 +0000
      Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 20:57 -0700
        Re: Unicode in Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-22 01:44 -0400
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 23:18 -0700
            Re: Unicode in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 16:32 +1000
        Re: Unicode in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-22 06:11 +0000
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 23:30 -0700
            Re: Unicode in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 16:44 +1000
            Re: Unicode in Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-22 02:07 -0700
              Re: Unicode in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-22 12:21 +0000
                Re: Unicode in Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-22 08:28 -0700
        Re: Unicode in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 00:31 -0600
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 02:23 -0700
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 11:09 -0700
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 10:22 -0600
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:56 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 18:29 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-04-20 17:41 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 02:46 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-04-20 14:40 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 17:58 -0400
        Re: Why Python 3? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-04-20 18:02 -0400
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 12:22 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-21 02:13 +0000
  Re: Why Python 3? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2014-04-19 13:53 +0200
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 22:46 +1000
    Re: Why Python 3? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:59 -0700
  Re: Why Python 3? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 07:41 -0700
  Re: Why Python 3? Thomas Lehmann <thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-06 09:28 -0700

csiph-web