Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29490
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <prvs=6027b33e1=jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.015 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; '(at': 0.03; 'decorator': 0.07; 'least)': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'docstring': 0.16; 'email addr:functools.wraps(func)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'minor': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'module.': 0.27; 'email name:': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'function': 0.30; '-----': 0.32; 'function.': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'thank': 0.36; 'signature': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'you.': 0.61; 'received:194': 0.61; 'loose': 0.84; 'loses': 0.84 |
| X-IronPort-AV | E=Sophos;i="4.80,448,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="736503" |
| X-Virus-Scanned | amavisd-new at zimbra.sequans.com |
| Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:47:54 +0200 (CEST) |
| From | Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| To | Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> |
| In-Reply-To | <87txuvxn3b.fsf@handshake.de> |
| Subject | Re: Decorators not worth the effort |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Mailer | Zimbra 7.2.0_GA_2669 (ZimbraWebClient - GC7 (Linux)/7.2.0_GA_2669) |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.916.1348058864.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 22 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1348058864 news.xs4all.nl 6938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49601 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:29490 |
Show key headers only | View raw
----- Original Message ----- > Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: > > [snip] > >> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the > >> docstring > >> (at least) of the original function. I would add the > >> @functools.wraps(func) > >> decorator inside your decorator. > > > > Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ? > > Look at the "decorator" module. > Great, thank you. JM
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-09-19 14:47 +0200
csiph-web