Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #29490 > unrolled thread

Re: Decorators not worth the effort

Started byJean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com>
First post2012-09-19 14:47 +0200
Last post2012-09-19 14:47 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Re: Decorators not worth the effort Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-09-19 14:47 +0200

#29490 — Re: Decorators not worth the effort

FromJean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com>
Date2012-09-19 14:47 +0200
SubjectRe: Decorators not worth the effort
Message-ID<mailman.916.1348058864.27098.python-list@python.org>

----- Original Message -----
> Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes:
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the
> >> docstring
> >> (at least) of the original function. I would add the
> >> @functools.wraps(func)
> >> decorator inside your decorator.
> >
> > Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ?
> 
> Look at the "decorator" module.
> 

Great, thank you.

JM

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web