Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29490
| Date | 2012-09-19 14:47 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| Subject | Re: Decorators not worth the effort |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.916.1348058864.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
----- Original Message ----- > Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: > > [snip] > >> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the > >> docstring > >> (at least) of the original function. I would add the > >> @functools.wraps(func) > >> decorator inside your decorator. > > > > Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ? > > Look at the "decorator" module. > Great, thank you. JM
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-09-19 14:47 +0200
csiph-web