Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #21778

Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'function,': 0.07; 'argument,': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sake': 0.09; 'subject:application': 0.15; 'argument)': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'arguments': 0.18; 'subject:not': 0.19; '(which': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'subject:use': 0.24; 'function': 0.27; 'raise': 0.28; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'it?': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'normally': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'calling': 0.34; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.35; 'apply': 0.35; '(for': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; '8bit%:86': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'skip:\xd0 20': 0.77; 'received:88.154': 0.84; 'subject:skip:j 10': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:57:04 +0200
References <mailman.722.1331901933.3037.python-list@python.org> <42cac695-761e-4cdb-aa3b-7c82789b76f9@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4f636391$0$1382$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <mailman.724.1331914436.3037.python-list@python.org> <4f636acb$0$1381$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <4f636e43$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 88.154.62.242
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
In-Reply-To <4f636e43$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.736.1331931449.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 9
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1331931449 news.xs4all.nl 6942 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33793
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:21778

Show key headers only | View raw


16.03.12 18:45, Steven D'Aprano написав(ла):
> If f is a function which normally takes (for the sake of the argument)
> one argument, then f would call the function with no arguments (which may
> return a curried function, or may apply default arguments, or perhaps
> raise an exception). So how would you refer to the function itself
> without calling it?

lambda:f

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ray Song <emacsray@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 20:45 +0800
  Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:14 -0700
    Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:00 +0100
      RE: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-16 16:13 +0000
        Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:31 +0100
          Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-16 16:45 +0000
            Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 18:18 +0100
            Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 11:59 -0600
            Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:57 +0200
            Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-16 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 00:14 +0200
          Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-03-16 16:55 -0500
    Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-17 00:38 -0400
  Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2012-03-16 11:06 -0400
  Haskellizing python (was Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:26 -0700
  Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-16 23:39 -0700

csiph-web