Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21759
| Date | 2012-03-16 17:31 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application |
| References | <mailman.722.1331901933.3037.python-list@python.org> <42cac695-761e-4cdb-aa3b-7c82789b76f9@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4f636391$0$1382$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <mailman.724.1331914436.3037.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <4f636acb$0$1381$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | TIN.IT (http://www.tin.it) |
On 3/16/2012 17:13, Prasad, Ramit wrote: >>>> I confess i've indulged in Haskell and found >>>> f a >>>> more readable than >>>> f(a) >>> >>> Hmmm... What about: >>> >>> f a b >>> >>> versus >>> >>> f(a(b)) >>> >>> or was it supposed to be read as >>> >>> f(a)(b) >>> >>> >>> or as >>> >>> f(a, b) >>> >>> ?-) >> >> That would be >> f (a b) # Haskell >> f(a(b)) # Python > > I have not used Haskell so far, but in this case I think I prefer the > 'Explicit is better than implicit.' Are you sure that "call the function f with the params a and b" is better than f a b or f(a,b) ? > I would probably always forget if it should be > > f a b > > or > > f ( a b ) You wouldn't, because Haskel's way is more regular and makes a lot of sense: parentheses are for grouping and that's it. Kiuhnm
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ray Song <emacsray@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 20:45 +0800
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:14 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:00 +0100
RE: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-16 16:13 +0000
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:31 +0100
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-16 16:45 +0000
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 18:18 +0100
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 11:59 -0600
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:57 +0200
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-16 14:02 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 00:14 +0200
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-03-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-17 00:38 -0400
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2012-03-16 11:06 -0400
Haskellizing python (was Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:26 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-16 23:39 -0700
csiph-web