Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21797
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application |
| Date | 2012-03-17 00:38 -0400 |
| References | <mailman.722.1331901933.3037.python-list@python.org> <42cac695-761e-4cdb-aa3b-7c82789b76f9@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.749.1331959128.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 3/16/2012 9:14 AM, bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com wrote: > On Mar 16, 1:45 pm, Ray Song<emacs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I confess i've indulged in Haskell and found >> f a >> more readable than >> f(a) > > Hmmm... What about: > > f a b > > versus > > f(a(b)) > > or was it supposed to be read as > > f(a)(b) > > > or as > > f(a, b) > > ?-) One also has to consider Python calls with *args, **kwds, and arg=obj. These are all compile-time SyntaxErrors unless inside parens that follow a expression. Also, function calls, especially in a functional language without side-effects, do not usually occur in isolation. 'f(a) + 3' would have to be written as '(f a) + 3', so saving of parens anyway. Also, is 'f a - 2' f(a -2) or f(a, -2)? A new precedence rule is needed to disambiguage. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ray Song <emacsray@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 20:45 +0800
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:14 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:00 +0100
RE: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-16 16:13 +0000
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 17:31 +0100
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-16 16:45 +0000
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-16 18:18 +0100
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 11:59 -0600
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:57 +0200
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-16 14:02 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 00:14 +0200
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-03-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-17 00:38 -0400
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2012-03-16 11:06 -0400
Haskellizing python (was Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 22:26 -0700
Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-16 23:39 -0700
csiph-web