Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #11567

Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <philip@semanchuk.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'plenty': 0.03; 'warnings': 0.05; 'builtins': 0.07; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'builtin': 0.09; 'deliberately': 0.09; 'highlight': 0.09; 'not?': 0.09; 'examples': 0.11; 'am,': 0.12; 'library': 0.15; '16,': 0.15; '"i\'m': 0.16; 'grep': 0.16; 'highlighting': 0.16; 'n00bs': 0.16; 'received:mindspring.com': 0.16; 'semanchuk': 0.16; 'subject:builtin': 0.16; 'such.': 0.16; 'sure,': 0.16; 'x-mailer:apple mail (2.1084)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.18; 'to:name:python-list': 0.18; 'seems': 0.20; 'detect': 0.21; 'sound': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cheers': 0.23; 'int,': 0.23; 'somehow': 0.23; 'variable': 0.24; 'there.': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'times,': 0.24; 'do,': 0.25; 'code': 0.25; 'fine': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'somebody': 0.28; 'all,': 0.28; 'raise': 0.28; 'problem': 0.28; 'looks': 0.29; 'not.': 0.30; 'times.': 0.30; 'harm': 0.30; 'str': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'changes': 0.31; 'changing': 0.31; 'cases': 0.32; 'word.': 0.32; 'received:24': 0.32; 'yet': 0.32; 'source': 0.33; "isn't": 0.33; 'sort': 0.33; "what's": 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'probably': 0.33; "can't": 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'regardless': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'yourself.': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; 'all.': 0.34; 'advocate': 0.34; 'trouble': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'file': 0.36; 'issue': 0.36; 'skip:" 10': 0.36; 'opposed': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'something': 0.37; 'open': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'strong': 0.38; 'steven': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; "there's": 0.39; 'meaning': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'might': 0.40; "it's": 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; 'hope': 0.61; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'further': 0.64; 'sincerely': 0.64; 'believe': 0.65; 'cost': 0.65; 'anything,': 0.73; 'protecting': 0.73; 'average': 0.77; '"yes,': 0.84; '11:41': 0.84; 'bitten': 0.84; 'contributors': 0.84; 'message?': 0.84; 'received:69.73': 0.84; 'serious.': 0.84; 'warning.': 0.84; 'dozens': 0.91
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names?
From Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com>
In-Reply-To <4E4A8F94.50706@stoneleaf.us>
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:38:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
References <BB13E4C4D649234F84A01F6DF64BB87F076AD0CE@ccs-ex01.coldstorage.com> <mailman.22.1313446504.27778.python-list@python.org> <4e49c89a$0$30001$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.34.1313464992.27778.python-list@python.org> <4e49fcd7$0$29974$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2A3EB048-1F10-46E8-973F-9BBD303E7B9F@semanchuk.com> <4E4A8F94.50706@stoneleaf.us>
To python-list <python-list@python.org>
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - deimos.nocdirect.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - semanchuk.com
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.73.1313509143.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 76
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1313509143 news.xs4all.nl 23852 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36461
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11567

Show key headers only | View raw

On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:

> Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> Protecting n00bs from their own errors is an admirable aim, but have you
>>> considered that warnings for something which may be harmless could do more
>>> harm than good?
>> Isn't the whole point of a warning to highlight behavior that's not strictly
> > wrong but looks iffy? Sort of, "I can't be sure, but this looks like trouble
> > to me. I hope you know what you're doing". If we are to eschew warnings in
> > cases where they might be highlighting something harmless, then we would
> > have no warnings at all.
> 
> Sounds good to me.  ;)  Keep such things in the IDE's, and then those who desire such behavior can have it there.  Do not clutter Python with such.

You wink, yet you sound serious. What's with the mixed message? Do you honestly advocate removing all warnings from Python, or not? I sincerely would like to know what you think.


>>> Perhaps. But I'm not so sure it is worth the cost of extra code to detect
>>> shadowing and raise a warning. After all, the average coder probably never
>>> shadows anything,
>> One need look no further than the standard library to see a strong
> > counterexample. grep through the Python source for " file =". I see dozens
>> of examples of this builtin being used as a common variable name. I would
> > call contributors to the standard library above-average coders, and we can
> > see them unintentionally shadowing builtins many times.
> 
> What makes you think it's unintentional?  file makes a good variable name, and if you don't need it to actually open a file there's nothing wrong with using it yourself.

"Unintentional" as in, "I'm using file as a variable name because it's handy" as opposed to intentional as in "Yes, I am deliberately changing the meaning of this builtin". 


>>> and for those that do, once they get bitten *once* they
>>> either never do it again or learn how to shadow safely.
>> I have done it plenty of times, never been bitten (thankfully) and still
> > do it by accident now and again.
> 
> Seems to me the real issue is somebody using a builtin, such as str or int, and that they somehow manage to do this without realizing, "wait a sec', that's one of my variables!"  

Yes


> I don't see that as a problem that Python needs to solve.

"need" is a strong word. Python will be fine regardless of whether this changes or not. I believe Python could be improved; that's all I'm arguing.

Cheers
Philip

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 23:15 +0100
  Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-16 11:32 +1000
    Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-15 23:23 -0400
      Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-16 15:15 +1000
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 10:13 -0400
          Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 08:44 -0700
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 12:23 -0500
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 16:12 +0100
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-16 08:41 -0700
          Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-16 17:11 +0000
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-16 10:48 -0700
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-16 13:34 -0500
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 11:31 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 11:38 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-16 09:19 -0700
          Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-16 17:11 +0000
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-16 10:43 -0700
              Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-16 18:56 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-16 19:32 -0400
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-16 23:49 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:02 +0100
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 01:35 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 08:27 +0100
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 16:33 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-16 22:10 -0400
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 19:23 +0100
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-16 11:10 -0500
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 12:32 -0400
          Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-17 11:29 +1000
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 22:16 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-16 10:07 -0700
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-16 17:11 +0000
          Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-17 10:58 +1000
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 03:17 +0000
              Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-17 18:15 +1000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 16:33 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-17 10:36 -0700
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 17:36 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-17 11:13 -0700
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 18:09 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 18:42 +0100
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-17 17:38 +0000
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 19:02 +0100
                Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-18 10:36 +1000
            Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 08:34 +0100
        RE: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? "Gerrat Rickert" <grickert@coldstorage.com> - 2011-08-16 13:15 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-16 19:29 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 20:18 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-16 22:15 -0400
        Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-16 22:51 -0400
        RE: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? "Gerrat Rickert" <grickert@coldstorage.com> - 2011-08-17 09:30 -0400
    Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 09:16 +0100
  Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-08-31 21:30 +0000
    Re: Why no warnings when re-assigning builtin names? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-31 21:57 +0000

csiph-web