Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66415
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory |
| Date | 2014-02-15 12:27 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <mailman.6952.1392433921.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-1037EA.22211114022014@news.panix.com> <CAHkxivccycyvqBsBPJMOTixufiTyv3GNCzU4ELgAUv2F+0EExA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidk3RTUqSZ1j3tgRQ7rGOHKsjwUwfE7m696Jp9QDvfhfdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmoUA5KC1mOH_NjYQJase2sAyRe9nRF1zT8DbH7pZ=os+g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6983.1392463648.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> OK, now the trick; adding `data = None` inside the generator works, but
>>> in my actual code I wrap my generator inside of `enumerate()`, which
>>> seems to
>>> obviate the "fix". Can I get it to play nice or am I forced to count
>>> manually. Is that a feature?
>>
>> Yeah, looks like enumerate also doesn't release its reference to the
>> previous object until after it gets the next one. You'll just have to
>> make do without.
>
> You could write your own enumerate function.
>
> def enumerate(it, i=0):
> it = iter(it)
> while True:
> yield i, next(it)
> i += 1
>
> That shouldn't keep any extra references around.
An alternative approach ist to yield weak refs and thus have the generator
control the object lifetime. This doesn't work with the built-in list type
though:
import weakref
try:
from itertools import imap # py2
except ImportError:
imap = map # py3
N = 0
def log_deleted(*args):
global N
N -= 1
print("deleted, new N: {}".format(N))
def log_created():
global N
N += 1
print("created, new N: {}".format(N))
def weakrefs(f):
def weakrefs(*args, **kw):
return imap(lambda x: weakref.proxy(x, log_deleted), f(*args, **kw))
return weakrefs
class List(list):
def __str__(self):
s = str(self[:5])
if len(self) > 10:
s = s[:-1] + ", ... ]"
return s
@weakrefs
def biggen():
sizes = 1, 1, 10, 1, 1, 10, 10, 1, 1, 10, 10, 20, 1, 1, 20, 20, 1, 1
for size in sizes:
data = List([1] * int(size * 1e4))
log_created()
yield data
data = None
if __name__ == "__main__":
for i, x in enumerate(biggen()):
print("{} {}".format(i, x))
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-14 22:21 -0500 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 21:31 -0600 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 00:27 -0700 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 18:41 +1100 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-15 11:03 +0000 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-15 12:27 +0100 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-15 12:28 +0000
csiph-web