Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66391
| References | <mailman.6952.1392433921.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-1037EA.22211114022014@news.panix.com> <CAHkxivccycyvqBsBPJMOTixufiTyv3GNCzU4ELgAUv2F+0EExA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidk3RTUqSZ1j3tgRQ7rGOHKsjwUwfE7m696Jp9QDvfhfdA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-15 18:41 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6974.1392450094.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, now the trick; adding `data = None` inside the generator works, but in
>> my actual code I wrap my generator inside of `enumerate()`, which seems to
>> obviate the "fix". Can I get it to play nice or am I forced to count
>> manually. Is that a feature?
>
> Yeah, looks like enumerate also doesn't release its reference to the
> previous object until after it gets the next one. You'll just have to
> make do without.
You could write your own enumerate function.
def enumerate(it, i=0):
it = iter(it)
while True:
yield i, next(it)
i += 1
That shouldn't keep any extra references around.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-14 22:21 -0500 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 21:31 -0600 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 00:27 -0700 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 18:41 +1100 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-15 11:03 +0000 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-15 12:27 +0100 Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-15 12:28 +0000
csiph-web