Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #66390

Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory

References <mailman.6952.1392433921.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-1037EA.22211114022014@news.panix.com> <CAHkxivccycyvqBsBPJMOTixufiTyv3GNCzU4ELgAUv2F+0EExA@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2014-02-15 00:27 -0700
Subject Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.6973.1392449266.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, now the trick; adding `data = None` inside the generator works, but in
> my actual code I wrap my generator inside of `enumerate()`, which seems to
> obviate the "fix".  Can I get it to play nice or am I forced to count
> manually. Is that a feature?

Yeah, looks like enumerate also doesn't release its reference to the
previous object until after it gets the next one.  You'll just have to
make do without.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-14 22:21 -0500
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Nick Timkovich <prometheus235@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 21:31 -0600
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 00:27 -0700
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 18:41 +1100
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-15 11:03 +0000
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-15 12:27 +0100
  Re: Generator using item[n-1] + item[n] memory Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-15 12:28 +0000

csiph-web