Re: Decorators not worth the effort

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<cameron@cskk.homeip.net>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'franklin': 0.09; 'newly': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'passing': 0.15; 'balloon': 0.16; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:202.125.174': 0.16; 'received:202.125.174.133': 0.16; 'received:boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'received:cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:edu.au': 0.16; 'received:harvey.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'received:homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'scientists': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'effort.': 0.22; 'cc:20': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:20': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; "i'm": 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'but': 0.36; 'generation': 0.36; 'received:au': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.40; 'john': 0.60; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'worth': 0.63; 'burden': 0.65; 'born': 0.71; '"what': 0.84; 'ask,': 0.84; 'cognitive': 0.84; 'paris,': 0.84; 'spoke': 0.93
Date	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:12:11 +1000
From	Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
To	alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: Decorators not worth the effort
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
In-Reply-To	<f7e2ec78-2c4a-402e-9a90-6cf0e7e55a54@c8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
References	<f7e2ec78-2c4a-402e-9a90-6cf0e7e55a54@c8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>
Cc	python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.658.1347588736.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	16
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1347588736 news.xs4all.nl 6920 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58587
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:29101

Show key headers only | View raw

On 13Sep2012 18:58, alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> wrote:
| On Sep 14, 3:54 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmic...@sequans.com>
| wrote:
| > I don't like decorators, I think they're not worth the mental effort.
| 
| Because passing a function to a function is a huge cognitive burden?

It is for me when I'm _writing_ the decorator:-) But if I get it right
and name it well I find it dramaticly _decreases_ the cognitive burden
of the code using the decorator...
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

Observing the first balloon ascent in Paris, [Ben] Franklin heard a scoffer
ask, "What good is it?"  He spoke for a generation of scientists in
his retort, "What good is a newly born infant?" - John F. Kasson

Thread

Re: Python presentations Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-09-13 19:54 +0200
  Re: Python presentations Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-09-13 18:18 +0000
  Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 18:58 -0700
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-09-14 12:12 +1000
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 20:25 -0700
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-14 08:40 +0200
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:29 -0400
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-09-15 09:13 +0200
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-16 17:38 -0700
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:31 -0400
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:37 -0400
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-18 16:47 -0700
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-18 16:47 -0700
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:33 -0400
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 15:16 -0600
      Re: Decorators not worth the effort Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-14 23:39 +0000
        Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 02:45 -0700
          Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 06:04 -0400
            Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 07:18 -0700
              Re: Decorators not worth the effort Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-09-18 14:16 +0200
            Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 07:18 -0700
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:42 -0400
    Re: Decorators not worth the effort "Dieter Maurer" <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-15 08:31 +0200

csiph-web