Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29202
| References | <mailman.623.1347558870.27098.python-list@python.org> <f7e2ec78-2c4a-402e-9a90-6cf0e7e55a54@c8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com> <874nn1jedk.fsf@handshake.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-14 23:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Decorators not worth the effort |
| From | Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.731.1347680541.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> wrote: >> On Sep 14, 3:54 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmic...@sequans.com> >> wrote: >>> I don't like decorators, I think they're not worth the mental effort. > > Fine. > > I like them because they can vastly improve reusability and drastically > reduce redundancies (which I hate). Improved reusability and > reduced redundancies can make applications more readable, easier > to maintain and faster to develop. Reduce redundancy, is argumentative. To me, a decorator, is no more than a logging function. Correct me if I'm wrong. It throws things at a functyion designed to watch other functions. The necessity for more than one decorator with if /else statements seems redundant, but I haven't had to use them that much recently. > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python presentations Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-09-13 19:54 +0200
Re: Python presentations Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-09-13 18:18 +0000
Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 18:58 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-09-14 12:12 +1000
Re: Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 20:25 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-14 08:40 +0200
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:29 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-09-15 09:13 +0200
Re: Decorators not worth the effort alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-16 17:38 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:31 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:37 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-18 16:47 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-18 16:47 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-14 16:33 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 15:16 -0600
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-14 23:39 +0000
Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 02:45 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 06:04 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-09-18 14:16 +0200
Re: Decorators not worth the effort 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:42 -0400
Re: Decorators not worth the effort "Dieter Maurer" <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-15 08:31 +0200
csiph-web