Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43657

Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

Date 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000
From Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Subject Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names
References <CAPTjJmqKmcbLZ9w3_xS06YTVZqTaSFt9BrRabozjSYJh+XqkgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.655.1366080290.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 15Apr2013 07:50, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quirky question time!
| 
| When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
| read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
| it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
| about just one of them:
| 
| ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
| ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
| 
| Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
| its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
| is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?

I do the former.
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000

csiph-web