Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43657 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000 |
| Last post | 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names |
| Message-ID | <mailman.655.1366080290.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 15Apr2013 07:50, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quirky question time!
|
| When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
| read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
| it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
| about just one of them:
|
| ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
| ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
|
| Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
| its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
| is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?
I do the former.
--
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web