Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43657 > unrolled thread

Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

Started byCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
First post2013-04-16 12:44 +1000
Last post2013-04-16 12:44 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-04-16 12:44 +1000

#43657 — Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

FromCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Date2013-04-16 12:44 +1000
SubjectRe: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names
Message-ID<mailman.655.1366080290.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 15Apr2013 07:50, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quirky question time!
| 
| When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
| read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
| it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
| about just one of them:
| 
| ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
| ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
| 
| Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
| its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
| is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?

I do the former.
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web